Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Birds can overcome the cardenolide defence of monarch butterflies in Mexico


Flocks of black-backed orioles (Icterus abeillei Lesson) and black-headed grosbeaks (Pheucticus melanocephalus Swainson) eat several hundred thousand monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.) in the dense overwintering colonies in central Mexico, and in 1979 were responsible for over 60% of the butterfly mortality at several sites1. Such predation is unusual because, during larval development the aposematically coloured monarch butterfly sequesters cardenolides from its milkweed foodplants (Asclepiadaceae)2,3. These bitter-tasting heart poisons cause vomiting in 12 species of birds in 9 families (refs 4–9, and L. P. Brower, unpublished observation), although the domestic chicken, Japanese quail, hedgehog, mouse and sheep8,10,11 have been shown to be insensitive to their emetic effects. Extensive predation of monarch butterflies by birds has never been observed except in Mexico. We report here that the Mexican butterflies are weakly emetic, and that taste discrimination by orioles and cardenolide insensitivity of grosbeaks allow these birds to feed freely on monarch butterflies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Calvert, W. H., Hedrick, L. E. & Brower, L. P. Science 204, 847–851 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reichstein, T., von Euw, J., Parsons, J. A. & Rothschild, M. Science 161, 861–866 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brower, L. P., Ryerson, W. N., Coppinger, L. L. & Glazier, S. C. Science 161, 1349–1351 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Swynnerton, C. F. M. Afr. orn. Un. 11, 32–108 (1915).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parsons, J. A. J. Physiol., Lond. 178, 290–304 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dixon, C. A., Erickson, J. M., Kellett, D. N. & Rothschild, M. J. zool Res. 185, 437–467 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brower, L. P. in Biochemical Coevolution (ed. Chambers, K. L.) 69–82 (Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rothschild, M. & Kellett, D. N. J. Ent. 46, 103–110 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brower, L. P., Fink, L. S. & Waide, R. B. (in preparation).

  10. Chaney, S. G. & Kare, M. R. J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 149, 938–943 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Benson, J. N. et al. Toxicon 17, 155–165 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brower, L. P., McEvoy, P. B., Williamson, K. L. & Flannery, M. A. Science 177, 426–429 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brower, L. P., Edmunds, M. & Moffitt, C. M. J. Ent. 49, 183–196 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brower, L. P. & Moffitt, C. M. Nature 249, 280–283 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brower, L. P. Scient. Am. 220, 22–29 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brower, L. P., Seiber, J. N., Nelson, C. N. & Bond, C. (in preparation).

  17. Roeske, C. N., Seiber, J. N., Brower, L. P. & Moffitt, C. M. Recent Adv. Phytochem. 10, 93–167 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. West, D. A. Auk 79, 399–424 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brower, L. P. & Glazier, S. C. Science 188, 19–25 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brower, L. P., Brower, J. V. Z. & Corvino, J. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 57, 893–898 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tuskes, P. M. & Brower, L. P. Ecol. Ent. 3, 141–153 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brower, L. P., Calvert, W. H., Glazier, S. C. & Sheppard, M. (in preparation).

  23. Urquhart, F. A. & Urquhart, N. R. Can. J. Zool. 56, 1759–1764 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Woodson, R. E. Jr. Ann. M. bot. Gdn 41, 1–211 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brower, L. P., Seiber, J. N., Nelson, C. N., Lynch, S. P. & Tuskes, P. M. (in preparation).

  26. Urquhart, F. A. & Urquhart, N. R. Can. Fld Nat. 93, 41–47 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rothschild, M. & Marsh, N. Ent. exp. appl. 24, 437–450 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Edgar, J. A., Boppré, M. & Schneider, D. Experientia 35, 1447–1448 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Edmunds, M. Defence in Animals (Longman, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fink, L., Brower, L. Birds can overcome the cardenolide defence of monarch butterflies in Mexico. Nature 291, 67–70 (1981).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing