Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Recombination suppression of mouse t-haplotypes due to chromatin mismatching

Abstract

We show here that recombination occurs at the normal rate in compound female mice containing two different complementing lethal haplotypes (th17/tw12 where there is a long stretch of homologous t-mutant chromatin. Thus the recombination suppression of a complete t-haplotype cannot be due to an intrinsic factor(s) which suppresses along the length of its own chromosome but is due to ‘mismatching’ of wild-type and mutant chromatin. Naturally occurring t-haplotypes of mouse chromosome 17 have several interesting genetic properties. First, they are always transmitted from males in much higher proportions than mendelian expectation; presumably this accounts for the maintenance of lethal and semilethal t-haplotypes at polymorphic levels in populations of wild mice, t-Haplotypes also show recombination suppression. The conventional map distance between genetic markers T and tf is 7–12 cM, whereas in (t/+) heterozygotes for naturally occurring t-haplotypes, recombination is suppressed and T and tf seem to be separated by only 0.1–0.5 cM (ref. 1). The region of recombination suppression extends to and includes the major histocompatibility complex (H–2)2. Thus t and H–2 effectively travel as a single unit— a ‘super gene’3. Although recombination suppression is known to be accompanied by failure of chiasmata formation4, the mechanism underlying the suppression has remained an enigma. Lyon suggested a disorder of t-heterochromatin5 and more recently a change in ‘intercalary’ middle repetitive DNA6. She proposed that either t-chromatin is intrinsically incapable of participating in crossing-over, or chiasma formation is prevented because of mismatching and mispairing of normal and abnormal chromatin. We have measured recombination between two chromosomes which carried extensive overlapping segments of t-chromatin. We report here that in this configuration, recombination occurs at a normal rate, and thus we conclude that cross-over suppression is due to mismatching.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennet, D., Dunn L. C. & Artzt, K. Genetics 83, 361–372 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hammerberg, C. & Klein, J. Genet. Res. 26, 203–211 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Snell, G. Folia biol., Prague, 14, 335–358 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Forejt, J. Folia biol., Prague, 18, 161–170 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lyon, M. F. & Meredith, R. Heredity 19, 301–339 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lyon, M. F., Evans, E. P., Jarvis, S. E. & Sayers, I. Nature 279, 38–42 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett, D., Artzt, K., Cookingham, J. & Calo, C. Genet. Res. 33, 269–277 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lyon, M. F. & Bechtol, K. B. Genet. Res. 30, 63–76 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Silver, L. M., White, M. & Artzt, K. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 6077–6080 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyon, M. F. & Mason, I. Genet. Res. 29, 255–266 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunn, L. C., Bennett, D. & Cookingham, J. J. Mammal. 54, 822–830 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silver, L., Artzt, K. Recombination suppression of mouse t-haplotypes due to chromatin mismatching. Nature 290, 68–70 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/290068a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/290068a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing