Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Gating charge immobilization and sodium current inactivation in internally perfused crayfish axons

Abstract

The sodium permeability in nerve is regulated by two gating processes, activation and inactivation1. Their relationship to one another has been described as ‘independent’1 or ‘coupled’2,3. An independent model, the Hodgkin and Huxley formulation, makes two testable predictions regarding gating current. First, as inactivation is voltage sensitive, it requires its own voltage sensor and might be expected to generate its own gating current. Second, gating current associated with activation should be unaffected by inactivation. Although charge movement associated with sodium activation is well characterized4, no inactivation charge movement has been described. Instead, depolarizations long enough to produce sodium current inactivation were found to diminish the charge movement associated with channel closing5. Inactivation temporarily immobilized a substantial fraction of the gating charge. These observations suit a coupled model in which inactivation gains its voltage dependence by coupling to activation3, and inactivation may in turn influence activation. However, the relative time course of the development immobilization (τimmob) was found to be the same3, the same in some voltage ranges6 and slower than that for inactivation (τinact). In crayfish axons inactivation is roughly five times faster than in squid, providing an interesting opportunity to compare inactivation and immobilization. Further, inactivation is so rapid that inactivation gating current should be easily visible. No inactivation charge movement was found and τimmob equals τinact.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. J. Physiol., Land. 117, 500–544 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldman, L. & Schauf, C. J. gen. Physiol. 59, 659–675 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong, C. M. & Bezanilla, F. J. gen. Physiol. 70, 567–590 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong, C. M. & Gilly, W. F. J. gen. Physiol. 74, 691–711 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bezanilla, F. & Armstrong, C. M. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 40, 297–304 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nonner, N. J. Physiol., Lond. 299–573–603 (1980).

  7. Meves, H. & Vogel, W. J. Physiol., Lond. 267, 377–393 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bullock, J. O. & Schauf, C. L. J. Physiol., Lond. 286, 157–171 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swenson, R. Gating charge immobilization and sodium current inactivation in internally perfused crayfish axons. Nature 287, 644–645 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/287644a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/287644a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing