Letter | Published:

S-adenosylmethionine—a novel regulator of aspartate kinase



Man derives 70% of his dietary requirement of protein directly from the grains of cereals and legumes. These sources are respectively deficient in lysine (and secondarily threonine) and methionine and much effort is being devoted to their improvement1. All three amino acids are derived from aspartate via a common metabolic pathway (Fig. 1) in which the first reaction catalysed by aspartate kinase is a key regulatory step limiting their production. In microorganisms, regulation of aspartate kinase occurs by a variety of mechanisms, commonly involving feedback inhibition of one or more isoenzymes by Lys plus Thr, Lys alone or Thr alone2. On the other hand, Met control of this step does not seem to conform to a general pattern. Met represses, but does not inhibit aspartate kinase II of Escherichia coli; in other species Met can enhance or modify the effects of Lys or Thr3. Similarly, varied controls involving Lys and Thr have been reported for the enzymes from higher plants4 with only one report of an effect of Met5. In contrast to these previous results, we suggest here that the methionine derivative (S)-S-adenosyl-L-methione (AdoMet) is an important regulator of the Lys-sensitive aspartate kinase of higher plants, and that this regulatory mechanism is highly conserved. There is thus a major synergistic interaction of the two nutritionally deficient amino acids Lys and Met to inhibit their own syntheses at the primary regulatory step in the pathway.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Miflin, B. J. Nature 275, 483–484 (1978).

  2. 2

    Truffa-Bachi, P. in The Enzymes Vol. 8 (ed. Boyer, P.D.) 509–553 (Academic, New York, 1973).

  3. 3

    Robert-Gero, M., Le Borgne, L. & Cohen, G. N. J. Bact. 112, 251–258 (1972).

  4. 4

    Miflin, B. J., Bright, S. W. J., Davies, H. M., Shewry, P. R. & Lea, P. J. in Nitrogen Assimilation in Plants (eds Hewitt, E. J. & Cutting, C. V.) 335–358 (Academic, London, 1979).

  5. 5

    Shrewy, P. R. & Miflin, B. J. Pl. Physiol. 59, 69–73 (1977).

  6. 6

    Bryan, P. A., Cawley, R. D., Brunner, C. E. & Bryan, J. K. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 41, 1211–1217 (1970).

  7. 7

    Cheshire, R. M. & Miflin, B. J. Phytochemistry 14, 695–698 (1975).

  8. 8

    Aarnes, H. & Rognes, S. E. Phytochemistry 13, 2717–2724 (1974).

  9. 9

    Aarnes, H. Physiologia Pl. 32, 400–402 (1974).

  10. 10

    Sakano, K. & Komamine, A. Pl. Physiol. 61, 115–118 (1978).

  11. 11

    Davies, H. M. & Miflin, B. J. Pl. Physiol. 62, 536–541 (1978).

  12. 12

    Lea, P. J., Mills, W. R. & Miflin, B. J. FEES Lett. 98, 165–168 (1979).

  13. 13

    Giovanelli, J., Mudd, S. H. & Datko, A. H. in The Biochemistry of Plants: a Comprehensive Treatise Vol. 5 (eds Stumpf, P. K. & Conn. E. E.) Vol. 5, Ch. 12 (Academic, New York, in the press).

  14. 14

    Madison, J. T. & Thompson, J. F. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 71, 684–691 (1976).

  15. 15

    Thoen, A., Rognes, S. E. & Aarnes, H. Pl. Sci. Lett. 13, 113–119 (1978).

  16. 16

    Davies, D. D. J. exp. Bot. 17, 320–331 (1966).

  17. 17

    Schlenk, F. & Zydek-Cwick, C. R. Archs Biochem. Biophys. 134, 414–422 (1969).

  18. 18

    Matthews, B. F. & Widholm, J. M. Can. J. Bot. 57, 299–304 (1979).

  19. 19

    Bright, S. W. J., Lea, P. J. & Miflin, B. J. CIBA Fdn Symp. 72, 101–114 (1980).

  20. 20

    Bright, S. W. J., Rognes, S. E., Kueh, T. & Miflin, B. J. (in preparation).

  21. 21

    Umbarger, H. E. A. Rev. Biochem. 47, 533–606 (1978).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

About this article

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.