Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Structure of supernumerary limbs

Abstract

The generation of supernumerary limbs by rotation of amphibian limb buds or regeneration blastemas is a phenomenon well known to embryologists1,2. The recent revival of interest in this aspect of limb morphogenesis has been largely due to the stimulus provided by the polar coordinate model for control of limb outgrowth and pattern3 and subsequent efforts to test its validity. The geometrical rules postulated in the polar coordinate model make precise predictions about the handedness of supernumerary limbs. Following antero-posterior (AP) or dorso-ventral (DV) inversions, they should be of the same handedness as the stump, whether single or in pairs, but after inversion of both axes (APDV) pairs should be of opposite handedness3. It is surprising, therefore, that the structure of supernumerary limbs has never been studied in sufficient detail to report whether they really are normal limbs, for only the skeletal elements are examined in cleared whole mounts (see Fig. 1). This only allows an assessment of the AP axis, and to determine the dorsal and ventral surfaces (and hence the handedness), the curvature of the digits is noted. I therefore decided to study the muscle patterns of all types of supernumeraries, and report here that, contrary to expectation, the majority of APDV supernumeraries are not normal limbs but are mirror-image duplications in the dorso-ventral axis, that is, either double-dorsal or double-ventral. This presents problems for contemporary models of pattern formation in the limb, and issues a warning to those who use supernumerary limbs as an experimental tool to investigate other areas of developmental biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abeloos, M. & Lecamp, M. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 192, 639–641 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harrison, R. G. J. exp. Zool. 32, 1–136 (1921).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. French, V., Bryant, P.J. & Bryant, S. V. Science 193, 969–981 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grim, M. & Carlson, B.M. Z. Anat. Entwickl.-Gesch. 145, 137–184 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tank, P. W. Devl Biol. 62, 143–161 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wallace, H. & Watson, A. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 49, 243–258 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maden, M. & Turner, N. Nature 273, 232–235 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Slack, J. M. W. J. theor. Biol. 82, 105–140 (1980).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Turner, N. & Maden, M. (submitted).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maden, M. Structure of supernumerary limbs. Nature 286, 803–805 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/286803a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/286803a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing