Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

‘Activation-labile’ glucocorticoid–receptor complexes of a steroid-resistant variant of CEM-C7 human lymphoid cells

Abstract

For cytoplasmic glucocorticoid–receptor complexes to enter and accumulate in the nucleus a temperature-dependent event, ‘activation’ is required1–4. Activation can be achieved in vitro by increased ionic strength3–6, dilution or gel filtration7 and is manifested by an increased affinity of steroid–receptor complex for DNA3,5,7,8 and an altered elution profile from ion-exchange resins9–11. Munck and Foley have shown12 that activated complexes isolated from thymocytes elute from DEAE-cellulose in a manner identical to complexes activated in vitro. We report here that DEAE-cellulose chromatography of steroid–receptor complexes from CEM-C7, a cloned human leukaemic T-cell line sensitive to the cytolytic action of glucocorticoids13–15, and its steroid-resistant subclone 4R4 demonstrated that steroid receptors of clone 4R4 cannot form stable activated complexes. This defines a new defect in receptor action, activation lability (r+act1), which is unlike either the r, r+nt, or r+nti phenotypes previously described for mouse lymphoid variants16–19.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Munck, A. et al. J. Steroid Biochem. 3, 567–578 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rousseau, G. G., Baxter, J. D., Higgins, S. J. & Tomkins, G. M. J. molec. Biol. 79, 539–554 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baxter, J. D. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69, 1892–1896 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Higgins, S. J., Rousseau, G. G., Baxter, J. D. & Tomkins, G. M. J. biol. Chem. 248, 5866–5872 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Milgrom, E., Atger, M. & Baulieu, E.-E. Biochemistry 12, 5198–5205 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalimi, M., Beato, M. & Feigelson, P. Biochemistry 12, 3365–3371 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goidl, J. A., Cake, M. H., Dolan, K. P., Parchman, G. L. & Litwack, G. Biochemistry 16, 2125–2130 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cidlowski, J. A. & Munck, A. Biochim. biophys. Acta 543, 545–555 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Atger, M. & Milgrom, E. Biochemistry 15, 4298–4304 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parchman, L. G. & Litwack, G. Archs Biochem. Biophys. 183, 374–382 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakaue, Y. & Thompson, E. B. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 77, 533–541 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Munck, A. & Foley, R. Nature 278, 752–754 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Norman, M. R. & Thompson, E. B. Cancer Res. 37, 3785–3791 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harmon, J. M., Norman, M. R., Fowlkes, B. J. & Thompson, E. B. J. cell. Physiol. 98, 267–278 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harmon, J.M., Norman, M.R. & Thompson, E.B. in Steroid Receptors and the Management of Cancer (eds Thompson, E. B. & Lippman, M.) 113–130 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sibley, C. H. & Tomkins, G. M. Cell 2, 213–220 (1974); Sibley, C. H. & Tomkins, G. M. Cell 2, 221–227 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamamoto, K. R., Stampfer, M. R. & Tomkins, G. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. USA. 71, 3901–3905 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bourgeois, S., Newby, R. F. & Huet, M. Cancer Res. 38, 4279–4284 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pfahl, M., Kelleher, R. J. & Bourgeois, S. Molec. cell Endocr. 10, 193–207 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scatchard, G. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 51, 660–672 (1949).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Munck, A. & Wira, C. Meth. Enzym. 36, 255–264 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. & Randall, R.J. J. biol. Chem. 193, 265–275 (1951).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harmon, J.M. et al. (in preparation).

  24. Sando, J., Hammond, N. D., Stratford, C. A. & Pratt, W. B. J. biol. Chem. 254, 4779–4789 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leach, K. L., Dahmer, M. K., Hammond, N. D., Sando, J. J. & Pratt, W. B. J. biol. Chem. 254, 11884–11890 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Toft, D. & Nishigori, H. J. Steroid Biochem. 11, 413–416 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Moudgil, V. K., Nishigori, H., Essalu, T. E. & Toft, D. D. in Molecular Mechanisms of Steroid Hormone Action (eds Clark, J. H. & Roy, A.) (Springer, Berlin, in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, T., Harmon, J. & Thompson, E. ‘Activation-labile’ glucocorticoid–receptor complexes of a steroid-resistant variant of CEM-C7 human lymphoid cells. Nature 286, 507–510 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/286507a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/286507a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing