Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Why are distasteful prey not cryptic?

Abstract

Bright coloration among unpalatable prey is common1. Turner2 has suggested that, as with Fisher's explanation for the evolution of distastefulness itself3, such aposematic coloration has been favoured by kin selection. Distasteful aposematic prey tend to live in kin groups and predators sampling from such groups will learn to avoid conspicuous prey more readily than cryptic prey and, as a consequence, fewer members of conspicuous kin groups are preyed upon2,4–6. We know of no clear evidence that vertebrate predators take fewer trials when learning to avoid conspicuous rather than cryptic distasteful prey6,7. Here we report results from a series of experiments that provide such evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edmunds, M. Defence in Animals (Longmans, Harlow, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Turner, J. R. G. Nat. Hist. 84, 28–37 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Rettenmeyer, C. W. A. Rev. Ent. 15, 43–74 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matthews, E. G. Am. Nat. 111, 213–222 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harvey, P. H. & Greenwood, P. J. in Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 129–154 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gittleman, J. L., Harvey, P. H. & Greenwood, P. J. Anim. Behav. (in the press).

  8. Gittleman, J. L. thesis, Univ. Sussex (in preparation).

  9. Willis, A. J., McEwan, J. W. T., Greenwood, J. J. D. & Elton, R. A. J. Anim. Ecol. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gittleman, J., Harvey, P. Why are distasteful prey not cryptic?. Nature 286, 149–150 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/286149a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/286149a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing