Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Toad tadpoles associate preferentially with siblings

Abstract

Highly structured social systems can involve close kinship groups (eusocial insects1, lion prides2, helpers-at-the-nest in birds3). However, kinship generally has not been considered to be important or necessary for what seem to be merely gregarious phenomena, such as schooling behaviour4. In fact, Fisher first proposed kinship theory to explain the evolution of noxious taste in certain gregarious insect larvae. He reasoned that traits which at first may not be directly beneficial to the individual, such as distastefulness or warning coloration, might be selected for if they conferred advantage to siblings in the swarm5. Like some insect larvae, the tadpoles of many toads (genus Bufo) are conspicuously coloured, distasteful to predators and highly gregarious, forming densely packed schools in open areas along pond shores6. The tadpoles' aggregative behaviour may be important for feeding efficiency7,8, thermoregulation9 or predator deterrence8, but their conspicuousness coupled with their distastefulness suggest that schooling may also serve an apose-matic function. Consistent with the predictions of a kin selection model, we report here that tadpoles of the American toad (Bufo americanus) preferentially associate with siblings in laboratory conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson, E. O. Insect Societies (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertram, B. C. R. in Growing Points in Ethology (eds Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A.) 281–301 (Cambridge University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, J. L. A. Rev. ecol. Systems 9, 123–155 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw, E. Am. Scient. 66 166–175 (1978).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Wassersug, R. J. in Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans (ed. Vial, J. L.) 273–297 (University of Missouri Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richmond, N. D. Ecology 28 53–67 (1947).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bragg, A. N. Gnomes of the Night: the Spadefoot Toads (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1965).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Brattstrom, B. H. Herpetologica 18, 38–46 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gosner, K. L. Herpetologica 16, 183–190 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bekoff, M. in Parental Behavior in Mammals (eds Gubernick, D. & Klopfer, P. H.) (Plenum, New York, in the press).

  12. Porter, R. H., Wyrick, M. & Pankey, J. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 3, 61–68 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams, G. C. Michigan St. Univ. Mus. Pubis Biol. Ser. 2, 349–384 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Biol. 31, 295–311 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Biol. 7, 1–52 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kulzer, E. Z. vergl. Physiol 36, 443–463 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pfeiffer, W. in Pheromones (ed. Birch, M. C.) 269–296 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matthews, E. G. Am. Nat. 111, 213–222 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry (Freeman, San Francisco, 1969).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waldman, B., Adler, K. Toad tadpoles associate preferentially with siblings. Nature 282, 611–613 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/282611a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/282611a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing