Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Inter- and intraspecific variation in restriction maps of Drosophila mitochondrial DNAs

Abstract

Mitochondrial (mt) DNAs have been observed to be polymorphic for cleavage sites of various restriction endonucleases1–4. Although these studies involved a variety of organisms, they were insufficient for the estimation of the level of genetic variation in natural populations. mtDNAs of various Drosophila species are heterogeneous in length, with molecular weights (MWs) ranging from 9.90 to 12.35×106. The mtDNA molecule of Drosophila melanogaster contains a long A + T-rich region representing 25% of the circle length5,6. A comparison of mtDNAs from different species of Drosophila by electron microscope partial denaturation mapping has shown that the size of the A + T-rich region varies among different species5. We have previously presented electron microscope heteroduplex analysis of the mtDNAs of D. melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila virilis and showed that the sequence divergence was apparently greatest in the A + T-rich region, whereas the remainder of the molecule was much more evolutionarily conserved. The cleavage map of the D. melanogaster mtDNA molecule has been established using various restriction endonucleases6–8. The ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs) and the A + T-rich region have been positioned on this map. We now present the restriction endonuclease maps of the mtDNAs of three species of Drosophila. We also report the results of a systematic survey of restriction site variation in the mtDNAs of natural populations of these species and make a preliminary comparison with the level of variation of nuclear genes. Our data suggest that the mitochondrial genome may evolve in a similar way to allozymic variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Potter, S. S., Newbold, J. E., Hutchison, C. A. & Edgell, M. H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 4496–4500 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Upholt, W. B. & Dawid, I. B. Cell 11, 571–583 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Francisco, J. F. & Simpson, M. V. FEBS Lett. 79, 291–294 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buzzo, K., Fouts, D. L. & Wolstenholme, D. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 909–913 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fauran, C. M.-R. & Wolstenholme, D. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 3623–3627 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klukas, C. K. & Dawid, I. B. Cell 9, 615–625 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah, D. M. & Langley, C. H. Plasmid 2, 69–78 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolstenholme, D. R. & Fauran, C. M.-R. J. Cell Biol. 71, 434–448 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan, N. & Langley, C. H. J. molec. Evolut. (in the press).

  10. Kimura, M. Genetics 61, 893–903 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. Genetics 49, 725–738 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ewens, W. J. Theor. Population Biol. 3, 87–112 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leigh Brown, A. J. & Langley, C. H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 2381–2384 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gillespie, J. H. & Langley, C. H. Genetics 76, 837–854 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fitch, W. M. & Langley, C. H. in Progress in Molecular Anthropology (eds Good, M. & Tashian, R. E.) 197–219 (Plenum, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, D., Langley, C. Inter- and intraspecific variation in restriction maps of Drosophila mitochondrial DNAs. Nature 281, 696–699 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/281696a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/281696a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing