Letter | Published:

Natural atmospheric 14C variation and the Suess effect


THE dilution of the atmospheric 14CO2 concentration by large amounts of fossil-fuel derived CO2 which do not contain any 14C is commonly called the Suess effect. Its magnitude can be calculated with the same geochemical models as the global carbon cycle that also predict the future rise of atmospheric CO2 to be caused by the combustion of fossil fuels. Validation of a CO2 predictive model with the Suess effect 14C data is important because these two phenomena have a common cause, and therefore register model responses at roughly the same frequencies. Measurements of the Suess effect yield values between −15‰, and −25‰ in Δ 14C (in 1950)1, while different model predictions also cover about this range2,3. The requirement that a model correctly reproduces the Suess effect becomes a strong constraint when the accuracy of the measurement is improved to better than 2‰. 14C measurements in tree rings to an accuracy of 1.2‰ are reported here. The results indicate that the natural fluctuations of atmospheric 14C as yet preclude determination of the Suess effect to the accuracy required by the models.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Lerman, J. C., Mook, W. G. & Vogel, J. C. in Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology (ed. Olsson, I. U.) 275–301 (Wiley, New York, 1970).

  2. 2

    Bacastow, R. & Keeling, C. D. in Carbon and the biosphere (eds Woodwell, G. M. & Pecan, E. V.) 86–135 (US Atomic Energy Commission Conference 720510, 1973).

  3. 3

    Oeschger, H., Siegenthaler, U., Schotterer, U. & Gugelmann, A. Tellus 27, 168–192 (1975).

  4. 4

    Tans, P. P. & Mook, W. G. Radiocarbon 21, 22–40 (1978).

  5. 5

    Tans, P. P., de Jong, A. F. M. & Mook, W. G. Nature 271, 234–235 (1978).

  6. 6

    Damon, P. E., Long, A. & Wallick, E. I. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 20, 300–306 (1973).

  7. 7

    Keeling, C. D. Tellus 25, 174–197 (1973).

  8. 8

    Lingenfelter, R. E. & Ramaty, R. in Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology (ed. Olsson, I. U.) 513–537 (Wiley, New York, 1970).

  9. 9

    Forbush, S. E. Phys. Rev. 70, 771 (1946).

  10. 10

    Forbush, S. E., Stinchomb, T. B. & Schein, M. Phys. Rev. 79, 501 (1950).

  11. 11

    Münnich, K. O. Naturwisschaften 50, 218–221 (1963).

  12. 12

    östlund, H. G. & Engstrand, L. G. Radiocarbon 5, 203–227 (1963).

  13. 13

    Nydal, R., Lövseth, K. & Gulliksen, S. in Proc. 9th int. Conf. Radiocarbon Dating, California (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.