Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Confirmation of the Suess wiggles: 3200–3700 BC

Abstract

USING dendrochronologically dated tree rings de Vries1 showed that the atmospheric 14C concentration has not been entirely constant during the past few hundred years. By extending the North American bristlecone pine tree-ring chronology2 to nearly 8,000 yr ago, several radiocarbon laboratories succeeded in measuring deviations in the 14C concentration from the mid-nineteenth century natural 14C level to a maximum of about 10% around 4000 BC (refs 3–7). Superimposed on this general trend, Suess drew with ‘cosmic schwung’, medium-term variations through his data. These so-called ‘wiggles’ should correspond with variations in the abundance of radiocarbon in atmospheric carbon dioxide on a time scale between one decade and a few centuries. The resulting irregular shape of Suess' calibration curve has been questioned during the past few years8,9. The overall result, however, is that no generally accepted 14C calibration curve is yet available. It would be most convenient to measure 14C concentrations in single tree rings with much higher precision than the usual 4–6‰. For this, however, much larger samples are required than are available from the bristlecone pine tree. An excellent opportunity was presented by the sub-fossil oak trunks discovered in the river valley sediments of southern Germany9; our measurements of these trunks are reported here.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Vries, H. L. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. Proc. B61, 94–102 (1958).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferguson, C. W. Proc. 8th int. Conf. Radiocarbon Dating, Al-11 New Zealand (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Damon, P. E., Long, A. & Wallick, E. I. Proc. 8th int. Conf. Radiocarbon Dating, A28–44 (1972).

  4. Ralph, E. K. & Michael, H. N. 12th Nobel Symp., 237–245 (1970).

  5. Suess, H. E. Radioactive Dating and Methods of Low Level Counting, 143–151 (IAEA Vienna, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Suess, H. E. Radiocarbon 20, 1–17 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suess, H. E. Proc. 9th int. Radiocarbon Conf. UCLA and UCSD (in the press).

  8. Clark, R. M. & Renfrew, C. Archaeometry 14, 5–19 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearson, G. W., Pilcher, J. R., Baillie, M. G. L. & Hillam, J. Nature 270, 25–28 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker, P. Proc. IXth int. Radiocarbon Conf. UCLA and UCSD (in the press).

  11. Tans, P. P., de Jong, A. F. M. & Mook, W. G. Nature 271, 234–235 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tans, P. P. & Mook, W. G. Radiocarbon (in the press).

  13. Suess, H. E. & Becker, B. Proc. Symp. Die Dendrochronologie des Postglazials, 156–170 (Akad. d. Wiss. Mainz 1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DE JONG, A., MOOK, W. & BECKER, B. Confirmation of the Suess wiggles: 3200–3700 BC. Nature 280, 48–49 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/280048a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/280048a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing