Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

An independent microbial flora of the epithelium and its role in the ecomicrobiology of the rumen

Abstract

IT has been suggested that the bacterial flora of the rumen should be considered as three distinct, interacting populations—the bacteria of rumen fluid (the population which has been studied most extensively), the bacteria associated with food particles, and the bacteria adhering to the epithelial wall of the organ1. Until now, studies of the ‘epithelial’ population have been restricted to examination of postmortem samples of wall tissue and its attached bacterial flora2–5. A recently developed technique6 for feeding young sheep for long periods solely by infusion of protein and other essential nutrients into the abomasum, and of volatile fatty acids and bicarbonate buffer into the rumen, has provided us with an opportunity to study in isolation the role of the bacterial population of the wall in the ecomicrobiology of the rumen in the living animal. Our studies show that this population can exist independently of the other two populations, that it is primarily responsible for urea digestion in the rumen and that it initiates breakdown of dead epithelial tissue. Furthermore, our results point to an inverse relationship between ammonia concentration and ureolytic activity in rumen fluid, which may account for the control which ammonia exerts over flux of urea across the rumen wall7–9.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheng, K.-J., McCowan, R. P. & Costerton, J. W. Am. J. clin. Nutr. 32, 139–148 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauchop, T., Clarke, R. T. J. & Newhook, J. C. Appl. Microbiol. 30, 668–675 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, K.-J., Akin, D. E. & Costerton, J. W. Fedn Proc. 36, 193–197 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McCowan, R. P., Cheng, K.-J., Bailey, C. B. M. & Costerton, J. W. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35, 149–155 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, K.-J., Bailey, C. B. M., Hironaka, R. & Costerton, J. W. Can. J. Anim. Sci. (in the press).

  6. Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A., Wenham, G. & Corrigall, W. Br. J. Nutr. 41 (in the press).

  7. Varady, J., Boda, K., Havassy, I. & Bajo, M. Physiologia bohemoslov. 18, 23–27 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harrop, C. J. F. & Phillipson, A. T. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 82, 399–408 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy, P. M. & Milligan, L. P. Br. J. Nutr. 40, 149–154 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bryant, M. P. Dukes' Physiology of Domestic Animals, 8th edn (ed. Swenson, M. J.) 484–515 (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cook, A. R. J. gen. Microbiol. 92, 32–48 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Caffrey, P. J., Hatfield, E. E., Norton, H. W. & Garrigus, U. S. J. Anim. Sci. 26, 595–600 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, G. A. Can. J. Microbiol. 14, 409–416 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chalupa, W., Clark, J., Opliger, P. & Lavker, R. J. Nutr. 100, 161–169 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brent, B. E., Adepoju, A. & Portela, F. J. Anim. Sci. 32, 794–798 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mann, S. O., Masson, F. M. & Oxford, A. E. J. gen. Microbiol. 10, 142–149 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Appleby, J. C. J. gen. Microbiol. 12, 526–533 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mann, S. O. & Oxford, A. E. J. gen. Microbiol. 12, 140–146 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blackburn, T. H. & Hobson, P. N. J. gen. Microbiol. 29, 69–81 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Muhrer, M. E. & Carroll, E. J. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 885 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Wyk, K. & Steyn, P. L. J. gen. Microbiol. 91, 225–232 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th edn, 478–489 (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1974).

  23. Chapman, G. H. J. Bact. 51, 409–410 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mann, S. O. & Stewart, C. S. J. gen. Microbiol. 84, 379–382 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pennington, R. J. Biochem. J. 56, 410–416 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdel Rahman, S. & Decker, P. Nature 209, 618–619 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones, G. A. in Urea as a Protein Supplement, (ed. Briggs, M. H.) 111–124 (Pergamon, New York, 1967).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Chalupa, W. Fedn Proc. 31, 1152–1164 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jones, G. A., MacLeod, R. A. & Blackwood, A. C. Can. J. Microbiol. 10, 371–378 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Houpt, T. R. & Houpt, K. A. Am. J. Physiol. 214, 1296–1303 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Engelhardt, W. V. & Nickel, W. Archs ges. Physiol. 286, 57–75 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mann, S. O. J. appl. Bact. 31, 241–244 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hobson, P. N. Meth. Microbiol. 3 B, 117–132 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hungate, R. E. Meth. Microbiol. 3 B, 133–149 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Weatherburn, M. W. Analyt. Chem. 39, 971–974 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Luft, J. H. Anat. Rec. 171, 369–416 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WALLACE, R., CHENG, KJ., DINSDALE, D. et al. An independent microbial flora of the epithelium and its role in the ecomicrobiology of the rumen. Nature 279, 424–426 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/279424a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/279424a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing