Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Bimodal distributions of seedling weight in relation to density of Festuca paradoxa Desv.

Abstract

THE degree to which plants growing together interfere with one another by competing for resources such as light, moisture and nutrients is difficult to determine by direct measurement of resource depletion1. Plant ecologists have therefore looked for indicators of interference in population structure2,3. One proposed measure of interference is the shift that occurs from the ‘normal’ distribution of seed weight to a ‘log-norma’ distribution of the weight of seedlings grown from those seeds in an even-aged monoculture. This shift presumably reflects the emergence of a few large and dominant individuals and the suppression of larger numbers of small individuals. Recently Ford4 and Newbould5 have proposed that distributions of plant weight in competing populations are actually bimodal, resulting from the presence of distinct populations of large individuals with positive relative growth rates and small individuals with nearly zero growth rates. Even-aged plantations of Picea sitchensis demonstrate such disjunct growth rates, and mortality is confined to the smaller individuals4. Size distributions in naturally thinning populations of Abies balsamea and Prunus pensylvanica are also bimodal6. We have studied the distribution of seedling weight in even-aged stands of Festuca paradoxa, a native North American prairie grass7, and report here that although the distribution is bimodal, the bimodality is more striking at lower densities, where interference is less severe. This result is the reverse of that expected if the extent of bimodality were a direct indication of the magnitude of interference. Therefore, although bimodality may be an eventual outcome of interference, it cannot be used as a measure of the strength of interaction between individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harper, J. L. Population Biology of Plants (Academic, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koyama, H. & Kira, T. J. Inst. Polytech. Osaka City Univ. D 7, 73–94 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 55, 247–270 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ford, E. D. J. Ecol. 63, 311–333 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ford, E. D. & Newbould, P. J. J. Ecol. 58, 275–296 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohler, C. L., Marks, P. L. & Sprugel, D.G. J. Ecol. 66, 599–614 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weaver, J. E. North American Prairie (Johnsen, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, J. E. Biometry (Freeman, San Francisco, 1969).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. Statistical Methods, 6th edn (Iowa State University, Ames, 1967).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gottlieb, L. D. J. Ecol. 65, 127–134 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Black, J. N. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 1–14 (1957), 9, 299–318 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ross, M. A. & Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 60, 77–88 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mack, R. N. & Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 65, 345–363 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RABINOWITZ, D. Bimodal distributions of seedling weight in relation to density of Festuca paradoxa Desv.. Nature 277, 297–298 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/277297a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/277297a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing