Letter | Published:

Pollen dispersal and optimal outcrossing in Delphinium nelsoni

Naturevolume 277pages294297 (1979) | Download Citation



NATURAL SELECTION, in sexually reproducing plants, should often favour matings between individuals of intermediate genetic similarity. Matings between very similar individuals may lead to inbreeding depression because segregational load is revealed1,2, while matings between very dissimilar individuals may disrupt favourable gene combinations and lead to outbreeding depression3–5. Outbreeding depression in plants has been documented in crosses between species, varieties and isolated populations6–9, and reports of inbreeding depression date back at least a century10 We suggest that outbreeding depression will often occur on a much finer scale than previously recognised, especially in plants subject to restricted pollen and seed dispersal. Such plants are likely to show pronounced microgeographic genetic differentiation resulting from drift in subpopulations isolated by distance or from adaptation to local edaphic and biotic conditions11,12 Under these circumstances, a short outcrossing distance may be optimal not only because of intragenotypic effects, but also because it produces offspring sufficiently similar to the female parent to grow successfully near her, yet sufficiently genotypically diverse to maximise success of the total progeny in the face of coarse-grained temporal environmental variation13–15, frequency-dependent sibling competition16–18 or predation19–20. Here we present evidence that a short outcrossing distance is optimal for Delphinium nelsoni Greene and discuss the relationship between the optimal outcrossing distance for D. nelsoni and actual pollen dispersal by its main pollinators.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Crow, J. F. in Heterosis (ed. Gowen, J. W.) 282–297 (Iowa State College Press, Ames, 1952).

  2. 2

    Dobzhansky, T. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process 193–197 (Columbia University Press, New York, 1970).

  3. 3

    Darlington, C. D. & Mather, K. The Elements of Genetics 227–229 (Allen and Unwin, London, 1949).

  4. 4

    Falconer, D. S. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 261–263 (Longman, London, 1960).

  5. 5

    Prakash, S. & Lewontin, R. C. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 59, 398–405 (1968).

  6. 6

    Müller, H. The Fertilisation of Flowers 145–146 (Macmillan, London, 1883).

  7. 7

    Kruckeberg, A. R. Evolution 11, 185–211 (1957).

  8. 8

    Moll, R. H., Lonnquist, J. H., Velez Fortuno, J. & Johnson, E. C. Genetics 52, 139–144 (1965).

  9. 9

    Hughes, K. W. & Vickery, R. K. J. Genet. 61, 235–245 (1974).

  10. 10

    Darwin, C. The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom (Murray, London, 1876).

  11. 11

    Jain, S. K. & Bradshaw, A. D. Heredity 20, 407–441 (1966).

  12. 12

    Schaal, B. A. Nature 252, 703 (1974).

  13. 13

    Levins, R. Evolution in Changing Environments 10–38 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1968).

  14. 14

    Selander, R. K. & Kaufman, D. W. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 1875–1877 (1973).

  15. 15

    Treisman, M. J. theor. Biol. 60, 421–431 (1976).

  16. 16

    Kojima, K. & Yarbrough, K. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 57, 645–649 (1967).

  17. 17

    Seaton, A. P. C. & Antonovics, J. Heredity 22, 19–34 (1967).

  18. 18

    Allard, R. W. & Adams, J. Am. Nat. 103, 621–645 (1969).

  19. 19

    Clarke, B. in Taxonomy and Geography (ed Nichols, D.) 47–70 (Systematics Association, Oxford, 1962).

  20. 20

    Dolinger, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Fitch, W. L. & Breedlove, D. E. Oecologia 13, 191–204 (1973).

  21. 21

    Waser, N. M. Ecology (in the press).

  22. 22

    Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry 621–624 (Freeman, San Francisco, 1969).

  23. 23

    Epling, C. & Lewis, H. Evolution 6, 253–267 (1952).

  24. 24

    Pyke, G. H. Oecologia 36, 281–293 (1978).

  25. 25

    Brink, R. A. Heterosis (ed. Gowen, J. W.) 81–97 (Iowa State College Press, Ames, 1952).

  26. 26

    Heslop-Harrsion, J., Heslop-Harrison, Y. & Barber, J. Proc. R. Soc. B188, 287–297 (1975).

  27. 27

    Hogenboom, N. G. Proc. R. Soc. B188, 361–375 (1975).

Download references

Author information


  1. Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112

    • M. V. PRICE
    •  & N. M. WASER
  2. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, Colorado, 81224

    • M. V. PRICE
    •  & N. M. WASER


  1. Search for M. V. PRICE in:

  2. Search for N. M. WASER in:

About this article

Publication history



Issue Date



Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.