Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Primary afferent depolarisation of tooth pulp afferents is not affected by naloxone

Abstract

RECENT studies (for review see ref. 1) have indicated the existence of endogenous opiate-related peptides and opiate receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (the caudal-most component of the trigeminal spinal tract nucleus in the brain stem). Both structures have marginal and substantia gelatinosa layers, receive the terminals of Aδ and C nociceptive afferents, and constitute essential components of spinal or trigeminal nociceptive pathways2,3. It has been suggested1,4–7 that endogenous opiate-related peptides located in presynaptic endings play an important part in nociceptive transmission by inhibiting the presynaptic input to neurones in nociceptive pathways; presynaptic inhibition is thought8 to result from primary afferent depolarisation (PAD). It has previously been found that jaw-opening reflex activity9–11 and the responses of trigeminal brain stem neurones10,11 to noxious orofacial stimuli can be suppressed by stimulation of the periaqueductal grey matter (PGM) and that this descending control is at least partially narcotic-related in the cat, as it can often be reversed by administering the opiate antagonist naloxone. Furthermore, the iontophoretic application of the opiate-related peptide enkephalin also depresses the activity of these neurones12,13. If the opiate-related peptides are in fact involved in this suppression at a presynaptic level, then by stimulating PGM and related structures one should be able to produce PAD in nociceptive afferents and then abolish the PAD by naloxone administration. We describe here the first test of this proposition, using the tooth pulp (TP) as the source of nociceptive afferents14,15. We have found that these afferents are subject to PAD which, however, cannot be abolished by naloxone.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snyder, S. H. Interdisciplinary Sci. Rev. 3, 46–54 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kerr, F. W. L. & Casey, K. L. Neurosci. Res. Prog. Bull. 16, 1–207 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubner, R., Gobel, S. & Price, D. D. in Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, Vol. 1 (eds Bonica, J. J. & Albe-Fessard, D.) 137–148 (Raven, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. LaMotte, C., Pert, C. B. & Snyder, S. H. Brain Res. 112, 407–412 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jessell, T. M. & Iverson, L. L. Nature 268, 549–551 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. MacDonald, R. L. & Nelson, P. G. Science 199, 1449–1450 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heller, J. M., Simon, E. J., Crain, S. M. & Peterson, E. R. Brain Res. 145, 396–400 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burke, R. E. & Rudomin, P. in Handbook of Physiology-The Nervous System, Vol. 1, 877–944 (American Physiology Society, Bethesda, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oliveras, J. L., Woda, A., Guilbaud, G. & Besson, J. M. Brain Res. 72, 328–331 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sessle, B. J., Dubner, R., Greenwood, L. F. & Lucier, G. E. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmac. 54, 66–69 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sessle, B. J., Dubner, R., Hu, J. W. & Lucier, G. E. in Pain in the Trigeminal Area (eds Anderson, D. J. & Matthews, B.) 285–294 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andersen, R. K., Lund, J. P. & Puil, E. in Pain in the Trigeminal Area (eds Anderson, D. J. & Matthews, B.) 271–284 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henry, J. L., Hu, J. W., Lucier, G. E. & Sessle, B. J. Pain Abst. 1, 180 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson, D. J., Hannam, A. G. & Matthews, B. Physiol. Rev. 50, 171–195 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sessle, B. J. in Proc. 2nd Wld Congr. Pain (Raven, New York, in the press).

  16. Dubner, R. & Sessle, B. J. Expl Neurol. 30, 223–238 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sessle, B. J. & Greenwood, L. F. Brain Res. 117, 211–226 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wall, P. D. J. Physiol., Lond., 142, 1–21 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Darian-Smith, I. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 9, 301–395 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Davies, W. R., Scott, D. Jr., Vesterstrom, K. & Vyklicky, L. J. Physiol., Lond., 218, 515–532 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mayer, D. J. & Price, D. D. Pain 2, 379–404 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liebeskind, J. C. & Paul, L. A. A. Rev. Psychol. 28, 41–60 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, J., DOSTROVSKY, J. & SESSLE, B. Primary afferent depolarisation of tooth pulp afferents is not affected by naloxone. Nature 276, 283–284 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/276283a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/276283a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing