Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Humans and apes are genetically very similar

Abstract

MAN'S closest living relatives are the great apes—the African chimpanzee and gorilla, and the Asian orangutan. Humans (Homo) are classified in the family Hominidae; chimpanzees (Pan), gorillas (Gorilla) and orangutans (Pongo) are classified in the family Pongidae. The gibbons, or lesser Asian apes (genera Hylobates and Symphalangus), are classified in the family Hylobatidae. All three families of humans and apes are included in the superfamily Hominoidea. Linnaeus recognised the basic morphological similarities between humans and apes by placing them together in the order primates (Anthropomorpha), although in separate genera. He did not use any category of classification intermediate between ‘genus’ and ‘order’. However, when the ‘family’ category was introduced, humans and apes were placed in separate families. The prevailing view of modern taxonomists has been expressed by Simpson1: “Homo is both anatomically and adaptively the most radically distinctive of all hominoids, divergent to a degree considered familial by all primatologists”. With the methods of classical mendelian genetics it is impossible to make genetic comparisons between species which cannot be hybridised, as the presence of genes is ascertained by studying segregation in the progenies of crosses between individuals exhibiting different traits. However, advances in molecular biology have made possible comparisons between DNA sequences or, more often, between proteins from different organisms. If the proteins are identical in amino acid sequence, the genes coding for them are assumed to be identical. (This is not always true owing to the redundancy of the genetic code, but DNA nucleotide differences which change the encoded protein have greater evolutionary consequences than those which do not.) Many proteins from different organisms can be readily compared by means of gel electrophoresis. Although not all amino acid differences are detected by this method, it provides reasonably satisfactory estimates of the relative degree of genetic differentiation between closely related species. King and Wilson2 studied electrophoretically 44 gene loci coding for proteins in humans and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and found them to be about as similar as very closely related species of other organisms are to each other. We now report results confirming that finding and extend it to comparisons between humans and the other apes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Simpson, G. G. in Classification and Human Evolution (ed Washburn, S. L.) (Aldine, Chicago, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. King, M. C. & Wilson, C. A. Science 188, 107 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nei, M. Am. Nat. 106, 283 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayala, F. J. Evolut. Biol. 8, 1 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Britten, R. & Davidson, E. Science 164, 349 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Valentine, J. W. & Campbell, C. A. Am. Scient. 63, 673 (1975).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dobzhansky Th Ayala, F. J., Stebbins, G. L. & Valentine, J. W. Evolution (Freeman, San Francisco, 1977).

  8. McDonald, J. F. & Ayala, F. J. Can. J. genet. Cytol. 20, 159 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRUCE, E., AYALA, F. Humans and apes are genetically very similar. Nature 276, 264–265 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/276264a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/276264a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing