Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Study of the charge-state model for electrophoretic variation using isoelectric focusing of esterase-5 from Drosophila pseudoobscura


VARIOUS neutral models have been proposed to account for the observed levels of enzyme polymorphism in natural populations1–5. One such model, the charge-state or ladder-rung model2, has been suggested to be appropriate for the available electrophoretic data. The model assumes that the only amino acid substitutions detectable by electrophoresis would involve unit charge changes—substitution of a charged for an uncharged residue—and because of charge redundancy alleles would fall into phenotypic classes of equal net charge3,4. Thus an electrophoretic variant would be a heterogeneous molecular entity, rather than the product of a unique allele. It was proposed that these charge classes would be evenly spaced in electrophoretic mobility, because unit charge changes would be reflected as unit jumps in mobility, but Johnson6 has questioned this on the grounds that no two charged group substitutions should result in identical net charge changes. He argued that there would be no charge redundancy and that there would be a continuum of charged variants. It was also recognised that while many substitutions involving uncharged residues would probably go undetected, some could cause conformational changes which would be resolved by electrophoresis. This concern has been borne out by the electrophoretic data: although many enzymes fit the expectations for neutral alleles contingent on the charge-state model7,8, others, including some esterases, do not. The mobilities of variants of these esterases are not evenly spaced, and rare variants are often observed at intermediate as well as extreme electrophoretic mobilities. These characteristics have been attributed to the presence of conformation, as well as charge, variability. We have investigated the relative importance of charge and conformational change in producing electrophoretic variation by examining variants at the Est-5 locus of Drosophila pseudoobscura by isoelectric focusing; this allows charge balance to be examined in the absence of conformational variation. The results indicate that while the observed charge changes fit a charge-state model, conformational differences exist which may account for a substantial amount of the additional variation revealed at this locus by conventional electrophoresis.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. Genetics 49, 725–738 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Ohta, T. & Kimura, M. Genet. Res. 22, 201–204 (1973).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    King, J. L. Genetics 76, 607–613 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    King, J. L. & Ohta, T. Genetics 79, 681–691 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Brown, A. H. D., Marshall, D. R. & Albecht, L. Genet. Res. 25, 137–143 (1975).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Johnson, G. B. Genetics 78, 771–776 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Bulmer, M. G. Nature 234, 410–411 (1971).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Richardson, R. H. & Smouse, P. E. Biochem. Genet. 14, 447–466 (1976).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Lewontin, R. C. & Hubby, J. L. Genetics 54, 595–609 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Prakash, S., Lewontin, R. C. & Hubby, J. L. Genetics 61, 841–858 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    McDowell, R. E. & Prakash, S. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 4150–4153 (1976).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Cobbs, G. Genetics 82, 53–62 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Coyne, J. A., Lewontin, R. C. & Felton, A. A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (in the press).

  14. 14

    Johnson, G. B. Genetics 87, 139–157 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Cobbs, G. & Prakash, S. Genetics 87, 717–742 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Prakash, S. Evolution 31, 14–23 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Vesterberg, O. Biochim. biophys. Acta 257, 11–19 (1972).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RAMSHAW, J., EANES, W. Study of the charge-state model for electrophoretic variation using isoelectric focusing of esterase-5 from Drosophila pseudoobscura. Nature 275, 68–70 (1978).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing