Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Gradients in tumour growth

Abstract

WHEN tumour cells are inoculated into syngeneic mice their establishment and growth is subject to regulation by the host animal. We have shown this most effectively for the inoculation of a broad range of tumours into anterior compared with posterior portions of the trunk1. For example, when mammary tumour cells were injected intradermally into thoracic compared with lumbar regions of adult histocompatible mice, tumour growth anteriorly became detectable by more rapid palpation, and tumour growth was three to four times as rapid anteriorly as posteriorly. This difference between anterior and posterior injection sites also became manifest after subcutaneous inoculation; it was apparent after inoculation of a wide variety of tumour types (mastocytoma, melanoma, lymphoma, sarcoma, mammary adenocarcinoma); it was independent of the sex of the host animal; it was found in a variety of mouse strains; and it did not seem to be related to the immunocompetence of the host or to the immunogenicity of the tumour1,7. We have now determined that there are antero-posterior and dorso-ventral differences in the growth of tumour cells inoculated intradermally into adult histocompatible mice. Although we have no explanation for our results we suggest that the observed differences may reflect the existence of morphogenetic gradients reminiscent of those invoked to explain patterns of differentiation during ontogeny.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auerbach, R., Morrissey, L. W. & Sidky, Y. A. Cancer Res. 38, 1739–1744 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Karnik, V. & Prehn, R. T. (in preparation).

  3. Kobayashi, K. Cell Tiss. Res. 175, 319–324 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Auerbach, R. Wistar Institute Monograph, No. 1 Retention of Functional Differentiation in Cultured Cells 3–20 (Wistar Institute, Place, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, A. R. & Wolpert, L. Nature 257, 224–225 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Auerbach, R., Morrissey, L. W., Kubai, L. & Sidky, Y. A. Int. J. Cancer (in the press).

  7. Vaage, J. Meth. Cancer Res. 81, 33–58 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

AUERBACH, R., MORRISSEY, L. & SIDKY, Y. Gradients in tumour growth. Nature 274, 697–699 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/274697a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/274697a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing