Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Stability and diversity of ecological communities

Abstract

MAY1 drew an analogy between large randomly connected cybernetic networks2,3 and ecosystems. His analysis of stability criteria for such networks seems to contradict the traditional ecological hypothesis that ecosystem diversity contributes to functional stability4–7. May's analytical solution for large matrices in which each element by itself is stable showed that1 “too rich a web connectance or too large an average interaction strength leads to instability. The larger the number of species, the more pronounced the effect”. As the number of elements in the matrix increases, the transition region between stability and instability becomes increasingly narrow1–3. Thus, a complex system perched near this transition region is subject to a self-generating catastrophe upon only a minor modification of system parameters. If these models are applicable to real ecosystems, they obviously have immense implications for resource management as well as ecological theory. I report here an application of May's conclusion to a real ecological system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. May, R. M. Nature 238, 413–414 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashby, W. R. Design for a Brain (Chapman and Hall, London, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gardner, M. R. & Ashby, W. R. Nature 228, 784 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertalanffy, L. von Science 111, 23–29 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. MacArthur, R. H. Ecology 36, 533–536 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Odum, E. P. Japanese J. Ecol. 12, 108–118 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Margalef, R. Am. Nat. 97, 357–374 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton University, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Angelis, D. L. Ecology 56, 238–243 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lawlor, L. R. Am. Nat. 112, 445–447 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Poole, R. W. An Introduction to Quantitative Ecology, 336 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yarranton, G. A. J. Ecol. 54, 229–237 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Turkington, R. A. thesis, Univ. Wales (1975).

  14. Turkington, A. A., Cavers, P. B. & Aarssen, L. W. Can. J. Bot. 55, 2701–2711 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harper, J. L. J. Ecol. 55, 247–270 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McNaughton, S. J. (in preparation).

  17. Margalef, R. Perspectives in Ecological Theory, 7, (University of Chicago, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. MacArthur, R. W. Geographical Ecology, 29, 43–45 (Harper and Row, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Root, R. B. Ecol. Monogr. 37, 317–350 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Watson, R. M. thesis, Cambridge Univ. (1967).

  21. Oosting, H. J. The Study of Plant Communities, 77–78 (Freeman, San Francisco, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MCNAUGHTON, S. Stability and diversity of ecological communities. Nature 274, 251–253 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/274251a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/274251a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing