Letter | Published:

Geophysical constraints on structure and emplacement of Shap granite

Naturevolume 272pages526528 (1978) | Download Citation



To understand Caledonian granite genesis in Britain it is essential that studies into the two-dimensional surface features of intrusions continue into the third dimension using various geophysical techniques. The characteristics of continental crust stabilised in the British Caledonian have been discussed elsewhere1 and models for their evolution suggest a derivation direct from the mantle or by partial fusion of the oceanic crust. The Shap granite is no exception : geochronologically, geochemically and palaeomagnetically2 it belongs to the Devonian group of Lake District granites, including the Eskdale, Skiddaw and Sub-Pennine Weardale intrusions. This suite yields the low initial Sr87/Sr86 ratios ( 0.706) (P. J. O'Connor, G. C. B. and M. D. Max, in preparation) which are characteristic of mantle fusion followed by limited crustal scavenging. The Shap intrusion occurs in the eastern Lake District and outcrops as an irregular oval measuring 2.8 km east–west and 2km north–south. It is a porphyritic adamellite3 dated 393 ± 11 Myr (ref. 4) and occurs at the junction between Ordovician Borrowdale volcanics and Silurian Brathay flags. The granite possesses a broad metasomatic aureole containing grossular and epidote. There has been debate concerning the subsurface shape of the intrusion, which may be lopolith5 or cone-shaped with depth. The gravity survey of the Lake District6 strongly suggests the latter, but modelling was based on only 14 stations along a single linear traverse of the granite. A stock-like body, extending to 8 km depth, gave a satisfactory model at that time. Here we report the combined observations of ground-based gravity and magnetic field surveys which apply to the structure of the intrusion and its aureole rocks.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Brown, G. C. & Hennessy, J., Phil. Trans. R. Soc., Lond. (in the press).

  2. 2

    Piper, J. D. A., McCook, A. S., Watkins, K. P., Brown, G. C. & Morris, W. A. Geol. J. (in the press).

  3. 3

    Grantham, R. Proc. geol. Ass. 39, 299–331 (1928).

  4. 4

    Brown, P. E. et al. Proc. Yorks. geol. Soc. 34, 331–342 (1964).

  5. 5

    Marr, J. E. Geology of the Lake District (Cambridge University Press, 1916).

  6. 6

    Bott, M. H. P. J. geol. Soc., Lond. 130, 309–331 (1974).

  7. 7

    Cordell, L. & Henderson, R. G. Geophysics 33, 596–601 (1968).

  8. 8

    Aeromagnetic map of Great Britain, Sheet 1 (I.G.S. London, 1965).

  9. 9

    Harker, A. & Marr, J. E. Q. J. geol. Soc., Lond. 47, 266–328 (1891).

  10. 10

    Heirtzler, J. R., Peter, G., Talwani, M. & Zurflueh, E. G. Tech. Rep. No. 6 (Lamont Geological Observatory, Columbia University, 1962).

  11. 11

    Green, J. F. N. Proc. geol. Ass. 26, 195–223 (1915).

  12. 12

    Moseley, F. Q. J. geol. Soc., Lond. 116, 55–84 (1960).

  13. 13

    Fitton, J. G. & Hughes, D. J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 8, 223–228 (1970).

Download references

Author information


  1. Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Oxford Street, Liverpool, UK

    • C. A. LOCKE
  2. Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK

    • G. C. BROWN


  1. Search for C. A. LOCKE in:

  2. Search for G. C. BROWN in:

About this article

Publication history



Issue Date



Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.