Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Quasi-periodic fluctuations in electron content during a partial solar eclipse

Abstract

CHIMONAS and Hines1,2 have suggested that a solar eclipse might generate gravity waves in the atmosphere. During solar eclipse the localised cooling of the atmosphere in the lunar shadow causes an energy imbalance and the shadow moving at supersonic speed across the Earth's surface could be a continuous source of gravity waves propagating to great distances in the atmosphere. These quasi-periodic wave perturbations in the ionospheric electron density, caused by the coupling between the ionised and the neutral particles, have been detected by various investigators3–5 at middle and high latitude stations away from the path of the eclipse shadow. Hajkowicz6 has reported the observation of perturbations of quasi-peniods of less than 2 min, after the October 1976 eclipse. We report here the observation of quasi-periodic fluctuations in Faraday rotation angle Ω and the 1 MHz modulation phase delayφ of 40 MHz transmissions from ATS-6 geosynchronous satellite recorded at Trivamdrum (dip 0°57′S, geographical longitude 76°57′E) during the partial solar eclipse on 29 April 1976. φ directly gives columnar electron density integrated along the radio ray path from the satellite to the receiver; whereas Ω gives columnar integrated electron density only up to an altitude of 2,000 km because of the weightage by the component of the geomagnetic field along the ray path. For ATS-6 to Trivandrum ray path geometry, a change of 10° in Ω will be produced by a change of 0.47×1016 el. m–2 of electron (el.) content. In contrast to this, 10° change in φ will be produced by a change of 0.34 × 1015el. m–2. The accuracy of measurement of both Ω and φ is better than 1°.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chimonas, G. & Hines, C. O. J. geophys. Res. 75, 875 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chimonas, G. & Hines, C. O. J. geophys. Res. 76, 7003 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlson, H. C. et al. Nature 226, 1124 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Larfold, G. M., Jurgens, R. M., Vesecky, J. F. & Warhbann, T. W. J. atmos. terr. Phys. 34, 733 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davies, M. & Da Rosa, A. V. Nature 226, 1123 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. HajkowWicz, L. A. Nature 226, 147 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blackman, R. B. & Tukey, J. W. Measurement of Power Spectra (Dover, London).

  8. Georges, T. M. ESSA tech. Rep. IER 57-ITSA, 54 (1967).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VAIDYANATHAN, S., RAGHAVA REDDI, C. & KRISHNAMURTHY, B. Quasi-periodic fluctuations in electron content during a partial solar eclipse. Nature 271, 40–41 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271040b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271040b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing