Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Has man increased stratospheric ozone?

Abstract

MANY anthropogenic threats to the ozone layer have surfaced (eight so far) since McDonald first suggested that supersonic transport aircraft would lead to increased skin cancer. It should be comforting, therefore, that agricultural modifications to the Earth (increased oxygenation, drainage, and pH of the soil and destruction of bacteria culturing humus) are suggested here to be more important than addition of fixed nitrogen in modifying N2O production by denitrifying bacteria. If true, man should have caused an increase in total global ozone.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shapley, S. Science 195, 658 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnston, H. S. Science 195, 1280 (1977); J. Geophys. Res. 82, 1711 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, E. W. in Soil Conditions and Plant Growth 10th edn (Longman, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. McElroy, M. B. Int. Rev. Sci. 9, 127–211 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierotti, D. & Rasmussen, R. A. Jt Symp. Non-Urban Tropospheric Composition, Hollywood (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ELLSAESSER, H. Has man increased stratospheric ozone?. Nature 270, 592–593 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/270592a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/270592a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing