Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Absence of suppressor cells from rats bearing passively enhanced kidney allografts

Abstract

LYMPHOCYTES which inhibit the immunological responses of other lymphocytes are known as suppressor cells, and such cells have been shown to mediate both specific and nonspecific unresponsiveness in many experimental situations1–3. In the context of allotransplantation, Kilshaw et al.4,5 have found that the highly strain-specific unresponsiveness to skin allografts induced in adult mice by pretreatment with donor strain tissue extract and Bordetella pertussis vaccine, followed by a short post-operative course of antilymphocyte serum (ALS), is at least in part mediated by thymus-dependent lymphocytes. Thus, transfer of 25–100 × 106 spleen cells (optimally the lower dose5) from mice in the stable phase of unresponsiveness into ALS-treated syngeneic recipients established a long-lasting unresponsiveness to donor strain skin grafts in up to 50% of recipients. Because the nature of the mechanisms of immunological enhancement of kidney allografts in rats remain unclear6–8 we have carried out cell transfer experiments similar to those of Kilshaw et al. in order to discover whether suppressor cells also play a part in mediating the stable phase of the enhanced state. Fabre and Morris9 have previously failed to transfer unresponsiveness with spleen cells from rats with enhanced kidneys, but it is possible that transfer of cells to normal, syngeneic rats—as in their experiments—is an insufficiently sensitive method for detecting suppressor cells. Our results show that it is unlikely that suppressor cells or auto-anti-idiotype antibodies are responsible for the steady state of enhancement. A more likely explanation involves the induction of unresponsiveness by the continuous exposure of the recipient to histocompatibility antigens in the absence of Ia-like antigens—the latter determinants being obligatory requirements for the activation of T cells ‘helping’ both potentially reactive B cells and T cells capable of differentiating into killer cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gershon, R. K. Transpl. Rev. 26, 170–185 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tada, T., Taniguchi, M. & Takemori, T. Transpl. Rev. 26, 106–129 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. W. Dresser (ed.) Immunological Tolerance, Br. med. Bull. 32, 99–191 (1976).

  4. Kilshaw, P. J., Brent, L. & Pinto, M. Nature 255, 489–491 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kilshaw, P. J. & Brent, L. Transpl. Proc. 9, 717–719 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. French, M. E. & Batchelor, J. R. Transpl. Rev. 13, 115–141 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Batchelor, J. R. & Welsh, K. I. Br. med. Bull. 32, 113–117 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carpenter, C. B. d'Apice, A. J. B. & Abbas, A. K. Adv. Immun. 22, 1–65 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fabre, J. W. & Morris, P. J. Transplantation 14, 634–640 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Binz, H., Lindenmann, J. & Wigzell, H. J. exp. Med. 140, 731–741 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Binz, H. & Wigzell, H. J. exp. Med. 142, 197–211 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Binz, H. & Wigzell, H. Nature 262, 294–295 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Binz, H. & Wigzell, H. Nature 264, 778–780 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. McKearn, T. J., Stuart, F. P. & Fitch, F. W. J. Immun. 113, 1876–1882 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stuart, F. P., Scollard, D. M., McKearn, T. J. & Fitch, F. W. Transplantation 22, 455–466 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson, L. C., Binz, H. & Wigzell, H. Nature 264, 778–780 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cantor, H. & Boyse, E. A. J. exp. Med. 141, 1376–1389; 1390–1399 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Klein, J., Livnat, S., Hauptfeld, V., Jerábek, L. & Weissman, I. Eur. J. Immun. 4, 41–44 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rolstad, B., Williams, A. F. & Ford, W. L. Transplantation 17, 416–423 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Eijsvoogel, V. P. et al. Transpl. Proc. 5, 415–420 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner, H. & Nossal, G. J. V. Transpl. Rev. 17, 3–36 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hammerling, G. J. Transpl. Rev. 30, 64–82 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Welsh, K. I., Burgos, H. & Batchelor, J. R. Eur. J. Immun. 7, 267–272 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Batchelor, J. R., Welsh, K. I. & Burgos, H. Transpl. Proc. 9, 931–936 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hutchinson, I. V. & Zola, H. Transpl. Proc. 9, 961–963 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BATCHELOR, J., BRENT, L. & KILSHAW, P. Absence of suppressor cells from rats bearing passively enhanced kidney allografts. Nature 270, 522–524 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/270522a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/270522a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing