Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rate of offset of action of slow-acting muscarinic antagonists is fast

Abstract

ATROPINE generally behaves as a competitive antagonist of acetylcholine (ACh) at muscarinic receptors1–9 but its onset and offset of action are slow. It has been suggested that the rates of onset and offset of atropine blockade are determined by the rates of binding to and dissociation from the ACh receptor4,5,10 a suggestion which at first sight seems incompatible with competitive blockade. An alternative explanation is that access of antagonist (in contrast to agonist) to the receptors, and escape from their vicinity on washing, is delayed or impeded in some way11–15. Experiments in which atropine is applied to a small superficial region of the tissue would seem to offer the best chance of reducing this access factor to a minimum and help in deciding which explanation for atropine's slow action is correct. The iontophoretic method presents itself as the method of choice, but until now, no such experiments have been carried out. The results of this type of experiment carried out on smooth muscle are described here. They reveal that the rate of offset of blockade by slow acting muscarinic antagonists can be more than ten times faster than that seen when antagonists are applied by their addition to the solution bathing (or perfusing) the muscle.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clark, A. J. J. Physiol., Lond. 61, 547–556 (1926).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stephenson, R. P. Br. J. Pharmac. 11, 379–393 (1956).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arunlakshana & Schild, H. O. Br. J. Pharmac. 14, 48–58 (1959).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Paton, W. D. M. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 154, 21–69 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paton W. D. M. & Rang, H. P. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 163, 1–44 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Waud, D. R. Pharmac. Rev. 20, 49–88 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pauling, P. J. & Petcher, T. J. Nature 228, 673–674 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rang, H. P. Nature 231, 91–96 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker, R. W., Chothia, C. H., Pauling, P. & Petcher, T. J. Nature 230, 439–445 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rang, H. P. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 164, 488–510 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Furchgott, R. F. Pharmac. Rev. 7, 183–265 (1955).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thron, C. D. & Waud, D. R. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 160, 91–105 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts, F. & Stephenson, R. P. Br. J. Pharmac. 58, 57–70 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ginsborg, B. L. & Stephenson, R. P. Br. J. Pharmac. 51, 287–300 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Colquhoun, D., Henderson, D. & Ritchie, J. M. J. Physiol., Lond. 227, 95–126 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Del Castillo, J. & Katz, B. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 146, 339–356 (1957).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bolton, T. B. J. Physiol., Lond. 250, 175–202 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bolton, T. B. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 194, 99–119 (1976).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barlow, R. B., Scott, K. A. & Stephenson, R. P. Br. J. Pharmac. 21, 509–522 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Waud, D. R. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 158, 99–114 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gutfreund, H. Enzymes: Physical Principles (Wiley, London 1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BOLTON, T. Rate of offset of action of slow-acting muscarinic antagonists is fast. Nature 270, 354–356 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/270354a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/270354a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing