Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Upper limits for the radio pulse emission rate from exploding black holes

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 29 September 1977

Abstract

IT has been suggested1 that the explosion of a primordial black hole (pbh) might produce a coherent radio pulse detectable at a distance of 104 pc with a simple antenna. Several searches2–5 for radio pulses arriving from random directions in space, such as might be produced by supernovae5–7, have already been carried out using wide beam (all-sky) antennas, and the negative results obtained are used here to place limits on the pbh radio pulse emission rate per unit volume. An indication has already been given8 of the limits which some previous radio searches impose, and of the influence of antenna aperture and beamwidth on achievable limits. This paper presents a more general analysis of limit criteria, including consideration of the effects on the pulse timescale of the interstellar medium, and examines the factors which determine the optimum search strategy for pbh radio pulses. It is reported that the best radio limit4 known to the author, could be improved by at least times 106 using existing techniques. In addition, examination of this existing limit4 shows that it is already 80 times better (99.5% confidence level) than a limit which it has been suggested8 might be attainable in the optical region, and is 106 times better than pbh explosion rate limits obtained from γ-ray observations9,10, although the γ-ray limits do not involve the generation of a coherent electromagnetic pulse.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rees, M. J. Nature 266, 333–334 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Charman, W. N. et al. Nature 228, 346–348 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Troitskii, V. S. et al. Radiophys Quant. Electron. 16, 239–252 (1975), Trans. Radiofiz. 16, 323–341 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huguenin, G. R. & Moore, E. L. Astrophys. J. Lett. 187, L57–L58 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Colgate, S. A., McKee, C. R. & Blevins, B. Astrophys. J. Lett. 173, L87–L91 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jelley, J. V., Baird, G. A. & O'Mongain, E. Nature 267, 499–500 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Page, D. N. & Hawking, S. W. Astrophys. J. 206, 1–7 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Porter, N. A. & Weekes, T. C. Astrophys. J. 212, 224–226 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sironi, G. Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 166, 345–353 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Webster, A. S. Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 166, 355–371 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel, R. R. & Stephens, S. A. Space Sci. Rev. 17, 45–158 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Readhead, A. C. S. & Duffett-Smith, P. J. Astron. Astrophys. 42, 151–153 (1975), Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 174, 7–17 (1976).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Condon, J. J. & Backer, D. C. Astrophys. J. 197, 31–38 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The erratum article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1038/269450b0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MEIKLE, W. Upper limits for the radio pulse emission rate from exploding black holes. Nature 269, 41–42 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/269041a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/269041a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing