Abstract
DEEP-SEA sediments have been shown to possess a natural remanent magnetisation (NRM) that often can be attributed to the statistical alignment of detrital magnetic grains in the Earth's magnetic field at or shortly after the time of their deposition1,2. In favourable circumstances this remanence can be interpreted as a record of palaeomagnetic field behaviour3,4. In the study reported here we have attempted to describe relative variations in palaeomagnetic field intensity on a time scale of 104–105 yr, during the past 700,000 yr, using the palaeomagnetic record of deep-sea sediment piston core RC10-167 (33°2′N, 150°23′E), which has an exceptionally thick section of sediment deposited during the Brunhes normal polarity epoch5 (Fig. 1). After subtracting the stratigraphic contribution of several distinct volcanic ash layers interspersed with the otherwise uniform pelagic sediment6, we calculate an average deposition rate of 2.1cm kyr−1 between the adjusted level (1,470cm) of the Brunhes–Matuyama boundary (t=700,000 yr) and the top of the core, assumed t=0 yr. A 2-cm thick sample, representing about 1,000 yr of deposition, was taken at an average interval of 3.3 cm (representing about 1,600 yr). This sampling placed a theoretical limit of 3,000–4,000 yr on the period of a resolvable sinusoidal variation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kent, D. V. Nature 246, 32 (1973).
Lovlie, R. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 21, 315 (1974).
Opdyke, N. D. Rev. Geophys. Space. Phys. 10, 213 (1972).
Harrison, C. G. A. Earth Sci. Rev. 10, 1 (1974).
Opdyke, N. D. & Foster, J. H. Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 126, 83 (1970).
Hays, J. D. & Ninkovich, D. Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 126, 263 (1970).
Johnson, H. P., Lowrie, W. & Kent, D. V. Geophys. J. Roy. astr. Soc. 41, 1 (1975).
Harrison, C. G. A. & Somayajulu, B. L. K. Nature 212, 1193 (1966).
Opdyke, N. D., Kent, D. V. & Lowrie, W. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 20, 315 (1973).
Johnson, E. A., Murphy, T. & Torreson, O. W. Terr. Magn. Atmos. Elect. 53, 349 (1948).
Levis, S. & Banerjee, S. K. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 29, 219 (1976).
Bath, M. Spectral Analysis in Geophysics (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1974).
Kono, M. Phys. Earth planet. Interiors 5, 140 (1972); J. geophys. Res. 79 1135 (1974).
Cox, A. J. geophys. Res. 73, 3247 (1968).
Malkus, W. V. R. J. geophys. Res. 68, 2871 (1963); Science 160, 259 (1968).
Loper, D. E. Phys. Earth planet. Interiors 11, 43 (1975).
Rochester, M. G., Jacobs, J. A., Smylie, D. E. & Chong, K. F. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 43, 661 (1975).
Stacey, F. D. Physics of the Earth (Wiley, New York, 1969).
Vernekar, A. D. Met. Monogr. 12, 6 (1972).
Chappel, J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 26, 370 (1975).
Lowes, F. J. & Wilkinson, I. Nature 198, 1158 (1963).
Hays, J. D., Imbrie, J. & Shackleton, N. J. Science 194, 1121 (1976).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
KENT, D., OPDYKE, N. Palaeomagnetic field intensity variation recorded in a Brunhes epoch deep-sea sediment core. Nature 266, 156–159 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/266156a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/266156a0
This article is cited by
-
A full sequence of the Matuyama–Brunhes geomagnetic reversal in the Chiba composite section, Central Japan
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (2020)
-
Wavelet-based verification of a relative paleointensity record from the North Pacific
Earth, Planets and Space (2019)
-
A relative paleointensity record of the geomagnetic field since 1.6 Ma from the North Pacific
Earth, Planets and Space (2007)
-
Magnetostratigraphy of borehole EY02-2 in the southern Yellow Sea and its paleoenvironmental significance
Science Bulletin (2006)
-
Geomagnetic dipole strength and reversal rate over the past two million years
Nature (2005)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.