Abstract
THE question of how the female stigma of the plant recognises a pollen grain carrying a compatible male gamete from all the possibilities presented to it by air currents and visiting insects is an intriguing problem1. When pollen is recognised at the stigma surface, a mixture of components, including proteins and glycoproteins, are released from cavities in the pollen walls2,3. These components have been partially characterised4,5 and include those essential to the recognition process6. The pollen wall components flow over and bind to the stigma surface which is covered by a secreted sticky coating7. The binding of specific recognition factors determines the success of a mating8. We have attempted to identify factors involved in poller-stigma recognition, using immunochemical methods with rabbit antisera to pollen and stigma surface components. The major antigen of the stigma surface shows immunological identity and has the same molecular weight as an antigenic pollen wall component. This stigma antigen is also partially identical with components of other tissues of the same plant. Absorption experiments show that the cross-reacting antibodies can be removed from the antisera, leaving antibodies which interact only with the immunising antigen. This raises the question whether plant cells, like animal cells9, are specified according to their family, species, organ and tissue by surface determinants.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heslop-Harrison, J., A. Rev. Pl. Physiol., 26, 403–425 (1975).
Knox, R. B., and Heslop-Harrison, J., J. Cell. Sci., 6, 1–27 (1970).
Knox, R. B., J. Cell. Sci., 9, 209–237 (1971).
Lewis, D., Proc. R. Soc., Lond., B 140, 127–135 (1951).
Linskens, H. F., Z. Bot., 48, 126–135 (1960).
Knox, R. B., Heslop-Harrison, J., and Heslop-Harrison, Y., in The Biology of the Male Gamete (edit. by Duckett, J. G., and Racey, P. A.), 177–187 (Academic, London and New York, 1975).
Mattsson, O., Knox, R. B., Heslop-Harrison, J., and Heslop-Harrison, Y., Nature, 247, 298–300 (1974).
Knox, R. B., Clarke, A., Harrison, S., Smith, P., and Marchalonis, J. J., Proc. natn. Acad Sci. U.S.A. (in the press).
Kalian, B. D., and Reisfeld, R. A. (eds), Transplantation Antigens Markers of Biological Individuality (Academic, New York, 1972).
Harboe, N., and Ingild, A., Scand J. Immun., 2, Suppl. 1, 161–164 (1973).
Marshalonis, J. J., Biochem. J., 113, 299–302 (1969).
Lewis, D., in Genetics Today, 3 (edit. by Geerts, S. J.), 657–663 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1965).
Ascher, P. D., Euphytica, 15, 179–183 (1966).
Linskens, H. F., Accad. Naz. Dei Lincei Quaderno. N., 104, 47–56 (1968).
Brewbaker, J. L., in Pollen; Development and Physiology (edit. by Heslop-Harrison, J.), 156–170 (Butterworth, London, 1971).
Laemli, U. K., and Favre, M., J. molec. Biol., 80, 575–583 (1973).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CLARKE, A., HARRISON, S., KNOX, R. et al. Common antigens and male-female recognition in plants. Nature 265, 161–163 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/265161a0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/265161a0
This article is cited by
-
Floral-specific polypeptides of the Japanese morning glory
Planta (1988)
-
Is the ?rejection reaction? inducing ability in sporophytic self-incompatible systems restricted only to pollen and tapetum?
Theoretical and Applied Genetics (1982)
-
The evolution and breakdown of S-allele systems
Heredity (1979)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.