Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Characterisation of human cell lines and differentiation from HeLa by enzyme typing

Abstract

THE value of a great deal of research on cells in culture depends on the certain identity of the cells under investigation. Contamination of one cell line with another, leading to mixed cultures or in some cases complete overgrowth of the original cells by the contaminating line, is a longstanding problem. Interspecific contamination has been recognised by both immunological and karyological techniques1,2, but the most striking demonstration of intra-specific contamination was by Gartler3. He presented evidence, based on the detection of common genetically determined variation in two enzymes, that many permanent tumour cell lines, set up originally in several different laboratories, were in fact HeLa cells. Recently the problem of contamination with HeLa has become a focus of general interest and there has been a search for certain chromosomal and other characteristics of HeLa in a large number of established lines4–6. There is no guarantee, however, that the contaminating cell line will always be HeLa and there appears to be a need for a quick and reliable method for the absolute identification of all human cell lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Franks, D., Gurner, B. W., Coombs, R. A., and Stevenson, R., Expl Cell Res., 28, 608 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Defendi, V., Billingham, R. E., Silvers, W. K., and Moorhead, P., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 25, 359 (1960).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gartler, S. G., Natn. Cancer Inst. Monog., 26, 167 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nelson-Rees, W. A., Flandermeyer, R. R., and Hawthorne, P. K., Science, 184, 1093 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson-Rees, W. A., and Flandermeyer, R. R., Science, 191, 96 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lavappa, K. S., Macy, M. L., and Shannon, J. E., Nature, 259, 211 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, H., and Hopkinson, D. A., Handbook of Enzyme Electrophoresis in Human Genetics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hopkinson, D. A., and Harris, H., Biochemical Methods in Red Cell Genetics (edit. by Yunis, J. J.), Ch. 13 (Academic, New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carter, N. D., Gould, S. R., Parr, C. W., and Walter, P. H., Biochem. J., 99, 17P (1966).

  10. Porter, T. H., Boyer, S. H., Watson-Williams, E. J., Adam, A., Szeinberg, A., and Siniscalco, M., Lancet, i, 895 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Povey, S., et al., Ann. hum. Genet., 35, 455 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris, H., Hopkinson, D. A., and Robson, E. B., Ann. hum. Genet., 37, 237 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen, P. T. W., and Omen, G. S., Biochem. Genet., 7, 303 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Povey, S., et al., Ann. hum. Genet., 39, 203 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Komf, J., Bissport, S., Gussman, S., and Ritter, H., Humangenetik, 27, 241 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Giblett, E. R., Anderson, J. A., Chen, S.-H., Teng, Y.-S., and Cohen, F., Am. J. hum. Genet., 26, 627 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Turner, B. M., Beratis, N. G., Turner, V. S., and Hirschhorn, K., Clin. chim. Acta, 57, 29 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Turner, B. M., Turner, V. S., Beratis, N. G., and Hirschhorn, K., Am. J. hum. Genet., 27, 651 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rigby, C. C., and Franks, L. M., Br. J. Cancer, 24, 746 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bubenik, J., et al., Int. J. Cancer, 11, 765 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kit, S., Dubbs, D. R., and Frearson, P. M., Int. J. Cancer, 1, 19 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hampel, K. E., and Levan, A., Hereditas, 51, 315 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maio, J. J., and De Carli, L. L., Nature, 196, 600 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Povey, S., et al., Ann. Hum. Genet., 36, 247 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Arthur, E., et al., Nature, 257, 308 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hsu, S., et al., Science, 191, 392 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

POVEY, S., HOPKINSON, D., HARRIS, H. et al. Characterisation of human cell lines and differentiation from HeLa by enzyme typing. Nature 264, 60–63 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/264060b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264060b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing