Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

⃛ and more money for Paris laboratories


There are plans for increased investment in the research infrastructure of Paris, according to preliminary proposals for the multi-billion-franc scheme known as the ‘University of the Third Millennium’ (U3M). The proposals were discussed at a meeting of the programme's strategic committee last week (see opposite page).

The greater Paris area — Ile-de-France — has been the main loser in recent national schemes to expand research and higher education. Many of its universities and laboratories are in a dire state of decay.

Immediate priorities are the controversial multi-million-franc removal of asbestos from the sprawling Jussieu campus in the Latin quarter (see Nature 382, 291; 1996), and the construction of a university beside the new Library of France in the south-east of Paris. The networking electronic integration of the new library with the university library system is also likely to be given high priority. There are also plans for investment in research facilities at the four new universities created just outside Paris by U3M's predecessor, ‘University 2000’.

A renewal of efforts to develop the capital's research activities now also seems likely after a decade of separate government efforts to decentralize research from Ile-de-France. The area, which includes many government-funded research laboratories, accounts for less than a fifth of France's population and only a quarter of its student population, but carries out more than half the country's publicly funded research.

In 1992, the government demanded that thousands of research posts be transferred from Paris to regional centres by the end of the decade (see Nature 356, 373; 1992). The target set was to reduce the percentage of researchers in Paris to 40 per cent.

The Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) has moved 1,200 posts out of Paris, and, while 51.5 per cent of CNRS researchers worked in Ile-de-France in 1991, now less than 46 per cent do. This represents a fall of 8.7 per cent, whereas overall the number of CNRS researchers has grown by 4.5 per cent over the same period.

CNRS has achieved this shift largely through an affirmative employment policy, recruiting two researchers to regional centres for every one in the capital, and by investing in new regional centres.

Between 1990 and 1998 it spent FF1.2 billion (US$212 million) on joint regional initiatives with the state and local government, a sum matched by these bodies. It created 31 centres of excellence outside Paris, including one in electronics in Lille, materials research in Bordeaux, structural biology at Grenoble, and even a centre for taste research at Dijon, the home of French mustard.

But CNRS is now reconsidering its strategy. An internal working group on regional affairs recently submitted a report to Catherine Bréchignac, the director general of CNRS, asking whether it is time to reconsider its policy of differential recruitment.

The working group, chaired by Jacques Sevin, director of strategy at CNRS, argues that the ageing of the Paris research population provides a case for renewed recruitment and that, unless it receives renewed attention, its science base is likely to suffer. Ile-de-France is top of a new ranking of research activities (see below).

The group argues that, rather than decentralization from Ile-de-France, the development of regional metropoles should be the basis of the development strategy of CNRS.

The rehabilitation of Paris is likely to be included in the CNRS's regional policy, to be made public by Bréchignac later this year.

Sevin adds that regional development remains one of the biggest policy issues in CNRS. “The big work has been done, the task now is to consolidate,” he says. He adds that CNRS needs to organize a critical mass of scientists in new regional centres and to devote more investment to equipment than to constructing new laboratories.


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butler, D. ⃛ and more money for Paris laboratories. Nature 395, 311 (1998).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing