Temporary intestinal hypoxia induced by degradable microspheres


IN all mammalian cells and tissues studied, the adequate presence of molecular oxygen during irradiation enhances the effects of ionising radiations of low linear energy transfer (LET), such as X rays, γ rays or electrons, by a factor of 2 or 3, compared with the effects seen after irradiation in poor oxygenation conditions1,2. In radiotherapy, this oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) is assumed to be generally effective in all healthy tissues, whereas in poorly oxygenated tumour cells the partial radioprotection through hypoxia is believed to be efficient to an extent that the probability of tumour sterilisation may be affected critically3,4. It has been suggested that the relative concentration of oxygen in healthy and tumour tissues could be changed to improve the relative probability of curing the disease and of reducing clinical complications caused by radiation damage of healthy tissues. To this end, the introduction of ‘high LET’ radiations for which the oxygen effect is of little importance, is presently being attempted5. Attempts are also being made to increase the oxygen tension in poorly oxygenated areas by treatment of patients with hyperbaric oxygen during irradiation6. In experiments in our laboratories, we have tried various means of changing the oxygen concentrations in tissues to be irradiated by chemical removal of oxygen7 or by mechanical obstruction of the blood flow (K.E.A., J.O.F., C. Clintenberg, B.L., B.R. and S.Ö., unpublished). We are now investigating, in experiments on pigs, the possibility of attaining temporary local hypoxia in intestinal segments by obstructing the blood flow at the level of the arterioles by intra-arterial injection of cross-linked starch microspheres, 43 µm in diameter, that are degraded by the amylase activity of the serum8. With a proper choice of the degree of cross linking and of particle concentration, a hypoxic period of about 5 min duration, followed by rapid normalisation, was achieved.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Read, J., and Thoday, J. M., Nature, 160, 608 (1947).

  2. 2

    Gray, L. J., Conger, A. D., Ebert, M., Hornsey, S., and Scott, O. C. A., Br. J. Radiol., 26, 638 (1953).

  3. 3

    Deschner, E. C., and Gray, L. H., Radiat. Res., 11, 115 (1959).

  4. 4

    Fowler, J. F., in Current Topics in Radiation Research, II (edit. by Ebert, M., and Howard, A.), 305 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1966).

  5. 5

    Barendsen, G. W., in Current Topics in Radiation Research, IV (edit. by Ebert, M., and Howard, A.), 295 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968).

  6. 6

    van der Brenk, H. A. S., in Current Topics in Radiation Research, V (edit. by Ebert, M., and Howard, A.), 198 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969).

  7. 7

    Larsson, B., and Sténson, S., Nature, 205, 364 (1965).

  8. 8

    Arfors, E., et al. (in the press).

  9. 9

    Lindberg, B., Carlin, G., and Arfors, K. E., AB Pharmacia. Uppsala, Report File L302.

  10. 10

    Rink, R., and Kessler, M., in Oxygen Transport to Tissue (edit. by Bruly, D. F., and Bicher, H. I.), 469 (Plenum, New York, 1973).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.