Letter | Published:

Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays

Nature volume 395, pages 272274 (17 September 1998) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The recollection of past experiences allows us to recall what a particular event was, and where and when it occurred1,2, a form of memory that is thought to be unique to humans3. It is known, however, that food-storing birds remember the spatial location4,5,6 and contents6,7,8,9 of their caches. Furthermore, food-storing animals adapt their caching and recovery strategies to the perishability of food stores10,11,12,13, which suggests that they are sensitive to temporal factors. Here we show that scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) remember ‘when’ food items are stored by allowing them to recover perishable ‘wax worms’ (wax-moth larvae) and non-perishable peanuts which they had previously cached in visuospatially distinct sites. Jays searched preferentially for fresh wax worms, their favoured food, when allowed to recover them shortly after caching. However, they rapidly learned to avoid searching for worms after a longer interval during which the worms had decayed. The recovery preference of jays demonstrates memory of where and when particular food items were cached, thereby fulfilling the behavioural criteria for episodic-like memory in non-human animals.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:

    $199

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    in Organization of Memory (eds Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W.) 382–403 (Academic, New York, 1972).

  2. 2.

    Elements of Episodic Memory (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1983).

  3. 3.

    & Episodic and declarative memory: role of the hippocampus. Hippocampus (in the press).

  4. 4.

    in Proceedings of NATO Advanced Study Institute Series Maratea, Italy (eds Alleva, E., Fasolo, A., Lipp, H.-P. & Nadel, L.) 158–179 (Kluwer, The Hague, 1995).

  5. 5.

    & How marsh tits find their hoards: the roles of site preference and spatial memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 8, 354–375 (1982).

  6. 6.

    & Cache recovery and spatial memory in Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 11, 95–111 (1985).

  7. 7.

    Food storage, memory, and marsh tits. Anim. Behav. 30, 631–633 (1982).

  8. 8.

    & Memory for the content of caches by scrub jays (Apelocoma coerulescens). J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. (in the press).

  9. 9.

    & Differential memory for cache sites by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). J. Exp. Psych. Anim. Behav. Proc. 16, 162–168 (1990).

  10. 10.

    , & Seasonal patterns of food storing in the European jay (Garrulus glandarius). Ibis 138, 250–255 (1996).

  11. 11.

    , & Caching decisions by grey squirrels: a test of the handling time and perishability hypotheses. Anim. Behav. 52, 941–948 (1996).

  12. 12.

    Caching behaviour by eastern woodrats, Neotoma floridana, in relation to food perishability. Anim. Behav. 36, 1525–1532 (1988).

  13. 13.

    & Food perishability and inventory management: a comparison of three caching strategies. Am. Nat. 145, 948–968 (1995).

  14. 14.

    & Retrieval of stored seeds by marsh tits (Parus palustris) in the field. Ibis 128, 513–515 (1984).

  15. 15.

    & The effects of cache loss on choice of cache sites in the black-capped chickadee. Behav. Ecol. 5, 44–50 (1994).

  16. 16.

    & Once-pilfered cache sites not avoided by black-capped chickadees. Anim. Behav. 49, 1599–1602 (1995).

  17. 17.

    , , & Returns to emptied cache sites by Clark's nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana: a puzzle revisited. Anim. Behav. 45, 241–252 (1993).

  18. 18.

    & Motivational control of caching behaviour in the scrub jay Aphelocoma coerulescens. Anim. Behav. (in the press).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the NIH and the Whitehall Foundation toN.S.C. and from the BBSRC to A.D. We thank A. Quaglino, M. Caun, J. Greig, D. Griffiths, K. Sanford, E. Krebs and G. Krebs for their help with aspects of the experiment; E. Tulving for discussion and inspiration; and K. Britten, R. Gerlai, J. Krebs, D. Lee, P. Marler, L. Miyasato, R. Morris, K. Sanford, E.Tulving and A. Quaglino for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. *Section of Neurobiology, Physiology & Behaviour, University of California at Davis, California 95616, USA

    • Nicola S. Clayton
  2. †Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK

    • Anthony Dickinson

Authors

  1. Search for Nicola S. Clayton in:

  2. Search for Anthony Dickinson in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola S. Clayton.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/26216

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.