Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence that mutations in the suA polarity suppressing gene directly affect termination factor rho

Abstract

THE suA mutation in Escherichia coli is defined by its suppression of the polar effects of nonsense mutations on distal genes1. Richardson et al.2 discovered that two independent mutations in the suA gene affect the transcriptional termination factor rho. This suggests2 a mechanism for polarity: as long as ribosomes progress along the nascent message, transcription proceeds; but when ribosomal progress is blocked, exposure of the distal RNA somehow causes rho to terminate transcription prematurely. As others have noted3–6, the involvement of rho in translational polarity could explain several puzzling observations concerning the control of both transcription and translation. Richardson et al.2 proposed that rho may be the product of the suA gene. They hesitated to draw that conclusion, however, because they found a rather high level of rho activity, 9% of wild type, in a strain believed7 to contain an amber mutation in the suA gene (strain 2055). Either this amber lesion was extraordinarily leaky or, alternatively, the absence of suA gene function only partially and indirectly diminished the level of rho activity in the cell. The experiments reported here clarify this problem and argue that the transcriptional termination factor rho is indeed the direct protein product of the suA gene.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beckwith, J., Biochim. biophys. Acta, 76, 162–164 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Richardson, J. P., Grimley, C., and Lowery, C., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 72, 1725–1728 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adhya, S., Gottesman, M., and de Crombrugghe, B., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 2534–2538 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. de Crombrugghe, B., Adhya, S., Gottesman, M., and Pastan, I., Nature new Biol., 241, 260–264 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Franklin, N., J. molec. Biol., 89, 33–48 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Segawa, T., and Imamoto, F., J. molec. Biol., 87, 741–754 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morse, D., and Guertin, M., J. molec. Biol., 63, 605–608 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ratner, D., J. molec. Biol., 88, 373–384 (1974), ibid., 89, 803–807 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ratner, D., in RNA Polymerases (edit. by Chamberlin, M. and Losick, R.), (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, in the press).

  10. Wasmuth, J., and Umbarger, H., J. Bact., 116, 548–561 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berg, D., Barrett, K., and Chamberlin, M., in Methods in Enzymology, (edit. by Grossman, L. and Moldave, K.), 21 D, 506–519 (Academic, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts, J., Nature, 224, 1168–1174 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Malamy, M., in The Lactose Operon (edit. by Beckwith, J. and Zipser, D.), 359–373 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bertrand, K., et al., Science, 189, 22–26 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brunel, F., and Davison, J., Molec. gen. Genet., 136, 167–180 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RATNER, D. Evidence that mutations in the suA polarity suppressing gene directly affect termination factor rho. Nature 259, 151–153 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/259151a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/259151a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing