Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Domoic and quisqualic acids as potent amino acid excitants of frog and rat spinal neurones

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 28 August 1975

Abstract

THE finding that kainic acid (Fig. 1a) is a potent glutamate-like excitant of rat cerebral1 and cat spinal2 neurones has led us to test domoic acid (Fig. 1b), which is structurally related to kainic acid and wnich also occurs in certain marine algae and has similar anthelmintic properties3,4. We have also compared the actions of these two compounds with those of α-allo-kainic acid (Fig. 1c), a stereo-isomer of kainic acid and a weaker excitant of rat cerebral neurones1, and with quisqualic acid (Fig. 1d), an ascaricidal compound isolated from seeds of the plant genus Quisqualis5. Quisqualic acid is highly potent as a glutamate agonist at the crayfish neuromuscular junction6. Compounds were tested on rat spinal interneurones by micro-electrophoresis7 and on frog spinal motoneurones by superfusion of the procaine-blocked8 hemisected spinal cord in vitro9. On both these preparations (see Table 1), the anions of domoic and quisqualic acids were found to be at least two orders of magnitude more potent than L-glutamate, and equal to or stronger than kainate, whereas α-allo-kainate was a considerably weaker excitant.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shinozaki, H., and Konishi, S., Brain Res., 24, 368–371 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnston, G. A. R., Curtis, D. R., Davies, J., and McCulloch, R. M., Nature 248, 804–805 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Takemoto, T., Draigo, K., Kondo, Y., and Kondo, K., Yakugaku Zasshi 86, 874 (1966); Chem. Abstr., 66, 28604m (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takemoto, T., and Draigo, K., Archs Pharm., 293, 627–633 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Takemoto, T., Takagi, N., Nakajima, T., Arihara, S., and Koike, K., in 16th Symp. Chem. Nat. Prod., Osaka, Japan (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shinozaki, H., and Shibuya, J., Neuropharmacology, 13, 665–672 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Biscoe, T. J., Duggan, A. W., and Lodge, D., Comp. gen. Pharmac., 3, 423–433 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, R. H., and Watkins, J. C., J. Physiol., Lond., (in the press).

  9. Curtis, D. R., Phillis, J. W., and Watkins, J. C., Br. J. Pharmac., 16, 262–283 (1961).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barron, D. H., and Matthews, B. W. C., J. Physiol., Lond., 92, 276–321 (1938).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Curtis, D. R., Phillis, J. W., and Watkins, J. C., J. Physiol., Lond., 150, 656–682 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Curtis, D. R., et al., Brain Res., 41, 283–301 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Curtis, D. R., Watkins, J. C., J. Physiol., Lond., 166, 1–14 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Watkins, J. C., Curtis, D. R., and Biscoe, T. J., Nature, 211, 637 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnston, G. A. R., Curtis, D. R., De Groat, W. C., and Duggan, A. W., Biochem. Pharmac., 17, 2488–2489 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Konishi, S., and Otsuka, M., Brain Res., 65, 397–410 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Konishi, S., and Otsuka, M., Nature, 252, 734–735 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BISCOE, T., EVANS, R., HEADLEY, P. et al. Domoic and quisqualic acids as potent amino acid excitants of frog and rat spinal neurones. Nature 255, 166–167 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/255166a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/255166a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing