Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Invalid 4.01-Gyr model U–Pb ‘age’ of the Nakhla meteorite

Abstract

NAKHLA, an achondrite composed dominantly of the minerals ‘diopside’ and olivine1, is possibly a unique meteorite. It has a 39Ar–40Ar age of about 1.3 Gyr (refs 2 and 3) and recently its Rb–Sr age was shown by Papanastassiou and Wasserburg4 to be similar. In their discussion, these authors4 use the concept of model Rb–Sr ‘ages’ as part of their argument that Nakhla originated in a differentiated planetary body not unlike the Earth, and in particular to argue that this parent body suffered gross differentiation between 3.6 and 1.37 Gyr ago. We show that the U–Pb systematics of Nakhla are inconsistent with one or more of the assumptions required for the calculation of a model U–Pb ‘age’, thus indicating that model ‘ages’ for other radioactive decay schemes may be generally invalid.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prior, G. T., Mineralog. Mag., 16, 274 (1912).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Podosek, F. A., and Huneke, J. C., Geochim. cosmochim. Acta, 37, 667 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Podosek, F. A., Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 19, 135 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Papanastassiou, D. A., and Wasserburg, G. J., Geophys. Res. Lett., 1, 23 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arden, J. W., and Gale, N. H., Analyt. Chem., 46, 2 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Arden, J. W., and Gale, N. H., Analyt. Chem., 46, 687 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tatsumoto, M., Knight, R. J., and Allegre, C. J., Science, 180, 1279 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaffey, A. H., Flynn, K. F., Glendenin, L. E., Bentley, W. C., and Essling, A. M., Phys. Rev. C, 4, 1889 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wasserburg, G. J., and Papanastassiou, D. A., Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 13, 97 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rama Murthy, V., Evensen, N. M., Jahn, B.-M., and Coscio, Jr, M. R., Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf., Suppl. 3, Geochim. cosmochim. Acta, 2, 1503 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tera, F., and Wasserburg, G. J., Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 14, 281 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Houtermans, F. G., Nuovo Cim., 10, 1623 (1953).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tilton, G. R., and Steiger, R. H., Science, 150, 1805 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Podosek, F. A., Geochim. cosmochim. Acta, 35, 157 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Turner, G., and Cadogan, P. H., Abs. in Meteoritics, 8, 447 (1973).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cumming, G. L., Can. J. Earth Sci., 6, 719 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Papanastassiou, D. A., and Wasserburg, G. J., Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 5, 361 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mussett, A. E., Comm. Earth Sci.: Geophys., 1 (3), 65 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gale, N. H., Arden, J. W., and Hutchison, R., Nature phys. Sci., 240, 56 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huey, J. M., and Kohman, T. P., J. geophys. Res., 78, 3227 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HUTCHISON, R., GALE, N. & ARDEN, J. Invalid 4.01-Gyr model U–Pb ‘age’ of the Nakhla meteorite. Nature 254, 678–680 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/254678a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/254678a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing