Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cosmic rays and the Galaxy

Abstract

EVIDENCE on whether the majority of detected cosmic rays originate in our Galaxy has been inconclusive: arguments based on the abundance of uranium nuclei, the power available in supernovae, γ-ray emission, the absence of a 1020 eV cutoff, and the galactic origin of the electron component all involve uncertainties; but in each case a galactic origin seems to offer a more probable interpretation than an extragalactic origin. Near isotropy has until now been the discordant feature. Work by Krasilnikov et al.1 and Bell et al.2 now suggests that the arrival directions of the most energetic cosmic rays are almost certainly highly anisotropic. Although the distribution of arrival directions is quite different from that predicted by Karakula et al.3 for particles from galactic sources, we point out here that the evidence now indicates strongly a galactic origin for even the most energetic cosmic rays that reach us; we also suggest that there is a very extensive ordered magnetic field outside the plane of our Galaxy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krasilnikov, D. D., et al., J. Phys., A, 7, L176–180 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, C. J., et al. Proceedings of the 13th international Conference on Cosmic Rays, 4, 2525–8 (1973).

  3. Karakula, S., Osborne, J. L., Roberts, E., and Tkaczyk, W., J. Phys., A, 5, 904–15 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Linsley, J., and Watson, A. A., Nature, 249, 816–7 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kraus, J. D., and Ko, H. C., Nature, 172, 538–9 (1953).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hillas, A. M., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 277, 413–428 (1974).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Linsley, J., Proceedings of the eighth international Conference on Cosmic Rays, 4, 77–99 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sakakibara, S., J. Geomagn. Geoelect. (Kyoto), 17, 99–112 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Syrovatskii, S. I., Comments Astrophys. Space Phys., 3, 155–62 (1971).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Humble, J. E., et al. Proceedings of the 13th international Conference on Cosmic Rays, 3, 976–81 (1973); Daudin, J., Auger, P., Cachon, A., and Daudin, A., Nuovo Cim., 3, 1017–32 (1956); Cachon, A., Proceedings of the fifth Inter-American Seminar on Cosmic Rays, 2, XXXIX–1 (1962); Kota, J., NATO Advanced Study Institute on Cosmic Rays (in the press).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brownlee, R., thesis, Univ. Sydney (1970).

  12. Shklovskii, I. S., Soviet Astron., AJ, 17, 828–299 (1974).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HILLAS, A., OULDRIDGE, M. Cosmic rays and the Galaxy. Nature 253, 609–610 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/253609a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/253609a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing