Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Remote Sensing for Productivity in Pelagic Fisheries

Abstract

IT has been argued that the reason for going into space is to obtain a better look at our own planet. One of the specific projects of NASA will be remote measurement of phytoplankton chlorophyll in the world's oceans, the practical use of this measurement most often mentioned relating to pelagic fisheries. A proponent is Dr Maurice Blackburn of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, who argues that the detection of phytoplankton concentrations by the measurement of chlorophyll may increase the efficiency of the tuna fisheries by reducing the scouting time necessary for the fishing fleet. Blackburn's arguments are based on a rather simple hypothesis that the distribution of a pelagic fish such as the tuna is controlled by water temperature and the availability of food1. His group has tested this hypothesis in an area off Baja, California, where large schools of tuna concentrate, feeding primarily on a red crustacean. The crustaceans in turn feed at least partially on the phytoplankton, which are abundant in this area. There is some feeling among fishery biologists that the Baja case may be an exception. Also, if the energy change through the food web is higher than the generally accepted value of 10%, small fluctuations in primary production observed in the open ocean may be too small to explain the yield of a particular fish or its distribution2. As Blackburn points out, tests with pelagic fishes are not easily arranged. The opportunity for testing the hypothesis in the Atlantic Ocean occurred when the research vessel Delaware made an exploratory fishing cruise across the North Atlantic Ocean, roughly between the Azores and the North American coast3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blackburn, M., Fish. Bull., 68, 147 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steele, J. H., International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries, Spec. Publ., 6, 463 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cruise Report 63–4, Exploratory Fishing and Gear Research Base, Gloucester, Mass. (US Dept. of Interior, 1963).

  4. Yentsch, C. S., and Menzel, D. W., Deep-Sea Res., 10, 221 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yentsch, C., Herbard, F., Ext. J. Cons. Int. Pour L'Exp. Mer, 22, 184 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

YENTSCH, C. Remote Sensing for Productivity in Pelagic Fisheries. Nature 244, 307–308 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/244307a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/244307a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing