Abstract
THE problem of reducing conventional forces in the European setting in a balanced manner as between the forces of the NATO and Warsaw Pact countries is of some political interest. Here I set out to provide logical baselines, using a mathematical approach but without indulging in massive computation, for deciding when, and in what sense, small force reductions involving two opposing parties might be said to be balanced. Three different approaches to the question are made, each based on essentially different but plausible idealizations of what balanced reductions in military strength may mean, or may be taken to mean by the parties concerned.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Richardson, L. F., Arms and Insecurity (edit. by Rashevsky, N., and Trucco, E.), 370 (Stevens, London, 1960).
Saaty, T. L., Mathematical Models of Arms Control and Disarmament, 48, 49, 51 (Wiley, New York and London, 1968).
Ogorkiewicz, R. M., Design and Development of Fighting Vehicles, 140 (Macdonald, London, 1968).
The Military Balance 1970–71, 94 (Institute for Strategic Studies, London, 1970).
See Blackett, P. M. S., Studies of War, 198 (Oliver and Boyd, London, 1962).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BELLANY, I. Balancing Mutual Force Reductions. Nature 234, 361–362 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/234361a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/234361a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.