Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Social Values and Research in Human Embryology

Nature volume 231, pages 87–91 (1971)Cite this article

Abstract

New techniques for interfering with the early stages of human development raise difficult social and legal issues, which are discussed here by an embryologist and a lawyer. This article is based on a lecture and discussion held at the National Law Center of the George Washington University in December 1968.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Coke, E., Institutes of the Laws of England, Part 3, 50 (1641).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The statute law apparently originated in Act of 43 George III, Chap. 58, Sections 1 and 2 (1803); its substance now in force is the Offences against the Person Act 1861, 58.

  3. Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929 1.

  4. King v. Bourne, 1939 1 K.B. 687 (1938).

  5. Abortion Act, 1967, 1.

  6. Steptoe, P. C., Edwards, R. G., and Purdy, J. M., Nature, 229, 132 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gardner, R. L., and Edwards, R. G., Nature, 218, 346 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Raleigh Fitkin-Paul Morgan Memorial Hospital v. Anderson, 42 N.J., 421, 201 A.2d 537 (1964); Stewart v. Long Island College Hospital 58 Misc. 2d 432, 296 N.Y.S. 2d 41 (Sup. Ct. Trial Term; 1968).

  9. Gleitman v. Cosgrove, 49 N.J. 22, 227 A.2d 689 (1967).

  10. Etzioni, A., Science, 161, 1107 (1968); Peel, J., J. Biosoc. Sci., 2, 45 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gardner, R. L., Nature, 220, 596 (1968); Gardner, R. L., Advances in the Biosciences (edit. by Raspe, G.) (Pergamon, Vieweg, in the press).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gartler, S. M., and Linder, D., Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 29, 253 (1964); Nance, W. E., ibid., 415 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gandini, E., Gartler, S. M., Angioni, G., Argioles, N., and Dell Acqua, G., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 61, 945 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gatti, R. A., Meuwissen, H. J., Allen, H. D., Hong, R., and Good, R. A., Lancet, ii, 1366 (1968); Kretschmer, R., Jeamet, M., Mereu, T. R., Kretschner, K., Winn, H., and Rosen, F. S., Pediat. Res., 3, 34 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gurdon, J. B., Heredity, 16, 305 (1961); Quart. Rev. Biol., 38, 54 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Graham, C. F., Wistar Inst. Symp. Heterospecific Genome Interaction, Monograph No. 9, 19 (edit. by Defendi, V.) (Wistar Institute Press, 1969); Baranska, W., and Koprowski, J., J. Exp. Zool., 174, 365 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lunde, D. T., Amer. J. Psychiat., 126, 369 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lederberg, J., The way out of the impasse: reconstruction of man; Badalyan, L., The path of science: human safeguards, Literaturnaya Gazeta, Moscow, No. 20, 196 (1968) (Badalyan's original is in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lederberg, J., Tomorrow's Babies, Sixth World Cong. Fertil. Steril., Tel Aviv, Israel (Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  20. di Berardino, M. A., and Hoffner, N., Devel. Biol., 23, 185 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Neifakh, A., Biological experiments and moral problems; Petropavlovskii, R., The repetition of man: a doubtful objective, Literaturnaya Gazeta, Moscow, No. 31 (1969) (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gursky v. Gursky, 39 Misc. 2d 1083, 242 N.Y.S. 2d 406 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1963). See the debate on this and other questions in Leach, G., The Biocrats (Jonathan Cape, London, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rex v. Lynn, 2 TR. 733, 100 Eng. Rep. 394 (K.B. 1788).

  24. Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 355(i), 1964.

  25. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 1965.

  26. Eisenstadt v. Baird, last reported in 429 F 2d 1398 (1st Cir. 1970).

  27. Edwards, R. G., Symp. on the Social Impact of Modern Biology, 108 (British Society for Social Responsibility in Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, in the press).

  28. Gurdon, J. B., Quart. Rev. Biol., 38, 54 (1963); Lunde, D. T., Amer. J. Psychiat., 126, 369 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge,

    ROBERT G. EDWARDS

  2. The National Law Center, George Washington University, Washington DC

    DAVID J. SHARPE

Authors
  1. ROBERT G. EDWARDS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. DAVID J. SHARPE
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

EDWARDS, R., SHARPE, D. Social Values and Research in Human Embryology. Nature 231, 87–91 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/231087a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/231087a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing