Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Further Evidence for Reduced Role of Photorespiration in Low Compensation Point Species

Abstract

MOST plant species cannot show a net photosynthetic uptake of CO2 when the CO2 concentration of the surrounding atmosphere falls below about 50 p.p.m., because at this point photosynthetic carbon fixation is reduced by lack of substrate to the rate at which CO2 is being released from the plant by photorespiration. The concentration of CO2 at which this occurs is called the CO2 compensation point. A few species, including such important crop plants as Zea mays, have unusually low CO2 compensation points, typically near zero. Such plants may not photorespire, or alternatively may be capable of refixing all the photorespired CO2 by an unusually efficient photosynthetic mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kisaki, T., and Tolbert, N. E., Plant Cell Physiol., 11, 247 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldsworthy, A., Nature, 217, 62 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zelitch, I., Physiological Aspects of Crop Yield (ASA and CSSA, Wisconsin, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berry, J. A., Downton, W. J. S., and Tregunna, E. B., Canad. J. Bot., 48, 777 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Slack, C. R., Hatch, M. D., and Goodchild, D. J., Biochem. J., 114, 489 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Björkman, O., and Gauhl, E., Planta, 88, 197 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rabson, R., Tolbert, N. E., and Kearney, P. C., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 98, 154 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Forrester, M. L., Krotkov, G., and Nelson, C. D., Plant Physiol., 41, 428 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bull, T. A., Crop Science, 9, 727 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ongun, A., and Stocking, C. R., Plant Physiol., 40, 819 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheung, G. P., Rosenblum, I. Y., and Sallach, H. J., Plant Physiol., 43, 1813 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zelitch, I., J. Biol. Chem., 233, 1299 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson, A. T., and Calvin, M., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 77, 5948 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zelitch, I., and Walker, D. A., Plant Physiol., 39, 856 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coombs, J., and Whittingham, C. P., Phytochemistry, 5, 643 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ellyard, P. W., and Gibbs, M., Plant Physiol., 44, 1115 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GOLDSWORTHY, A., DAY, P. Further Evidence for Reduced Role of Photorespiration in Low Compensation Point Species. Nature 228, 687–688 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/228687a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/228687a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing