Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Structure Activity Relationships of some Muscarinic Agonists: a Reply to Shefter and Triggle

Abstract

IN essence, the criticism by Shefter and Triggle1 of my model2 for the interaction of acetylcholine, (CH3)3N+-CH2CH2OCOCH3, with muscarinic receptors is that it does not explain the muscarinic potency of some analogues of acetylcholine. I believe that my model does quite simply account for the activity of these compounds. As background information for my model, I made the general statement that muscarinic agonists are observed to have the N+ā€“Cā€“Cā€“O torsion angle between the positive synclinal and positive anticlinal2 (Fig. 1a). Shefter and Triggle do not quote any potent agonists for which this observation is untrue and I briefly show how it can be used to explain the muscarinic activity of the compounds they mention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shefter, E., and Triggle, D. J., Nature, 227, 1354 (1970).

    ArticleĀ  ADSĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Chothia, C. H., Nature, 225, 36 (1970).

    ArticleĀ  ADSĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Scott, K. A., and Mautner, H. G., Biochem. Pharmacol., 13, 907 (1964).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Shefter, E., Mautner, H. G., and Smissman, E. E., Acta Cryst., A 25, S201 (1969).

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Shefter, E., and Kennard, O., Science, 153, 1389 (1966).

    ArticleĀ  ADSĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Smissman, E. E., Nelson, W. L., La Pidus, J. B., and Day, J. L., J. Med. Chem., 9, 458 (1966).

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Beckett, A. H., Harper, N. J., Clitherow, J. W., and Lesser, E., Nature, 189, 671 (1961).

    ArticleĀ  ADSĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Triggle, D. J., Chemical Aspects of the Autonomic Nervous System, 83 (Academic Press, London and New York, 1965).

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CHOTHIA, C. Structure Activity Relationships of some Muscarinic Agonists: a Reply to Shefter and Triggle. Nature 227, 1355ā€“1356 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/2271355a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2271355a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter ā€” what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing