Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Minimum Sonic Boom Shock Strengths and Overpressures

Abstract

THE question of the minimum realizable sonic boom shock pressure rise is, in a sense, a closed one. For any given aircraft weight, flight Mach number and altitude, if the aircraft is sufficiently long, then shock waves may be avoided altogether. This is a consequence of two phenomena: the slow evolution of the signature toward its asymptotic shape in a homogeneous atmosphere1; the “freezing” of the signature shape that occurs because of the nearly exponential increase in atmospheric density with distance below the aircraft2. Typical length requirements for total elimination of the shock waves in the aircraft signature are beyond our present structural capability3. Ferri4 has pointed out, however, that within the lengths at present under consideration for the Boeing 2707 (318 feet), it is possible to design realistic aircraft with overpressures below those given by the far-field lower bounds4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLean, F. E., NASA TN D-2877 (1965); J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., Proc. Seventieth Meet., S 19 (1965).

  2. Hayes, W. D., Sonic Boom Research (edit. by Seebass, R.), NASA SP-147 3 (NASA, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seebass, R., Sonic Boom Research (edit. by Schwartz, I.R,.), NASA SP-180, 175 (NASA, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferri, A., and Ismail, A., Sonic Boom Research (edit. by Schwartz, I. R.), NASA SP-180, 73 (NASA 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones, L. B., Aero. Quart., 18, 1 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seebass, R., and McLean, F. E., AIAA J., 6, 1153 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kryter, K. D., NSBEO--1-67, 11 (1967).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SEEBASS, R. Minimum Sonic Boom Shock Strengths and Overpressures. Nature 221, 651–653 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/221651a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/221651a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing