Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effect of EDTA on Electrophoretic Mobility of Slime Mould Cells and its relationship to Current Theories of Cell Adhesion

Abstract

IT has been suggested that1,2 EDTA disaggregates cells by removing divalent cations from the electrostatic double layer, increasing the surface potential and thus the electrostatic repulsive force between cells. This hypothesis has never received confirmatory evidence and recent work has cast doubt on its validity3–6. We have used post-feeding cells of the cellular slime mould, Dictyostelium discoideum, to demonstrate that EDTA does not act through an increase in average electrostatic repulsive force. But in other conditions these forces seem to be important in determining whether or not the cells can adhere7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curtis, A. S. G., Biol. Rev., 37, 82 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Curtis, A. S. G., The Cell Surface: Its Molecular Role in Morphogenesis (Academic Press, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weiss, L., J. Cell Biol., 33, 341 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss, L., J. Cell Biol., 35, 347 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Armstrong, P. B., J. Exp. Zool., 155, 371 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong, P. B., and Jones, D. P., J. Exp. Zool., 167, 275 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Born, G. V. R., and Garrod, D., Nature, 220, 616 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sussman, M., in Methods in Cell Physiology (edit. by Prescott, D. M.), 2, 397 (Academic Press, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ashworth, J. M., and Sussman, M., J. Biol. Chem., 242, 1969 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abramson, H. A., Moyer, L. S., and Gorin, M. H., Electrophoresis of Proteins and the Chemistry of Cell Surfaces (Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pethica, B. A., Exp. Cell Res., suppl. 8, 123 (1961).

  12. Gingell, D., and Palmer, J. F., Nature, 217, 98 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GINGELL, D., GARROD, D. Effect of EDTA on Electrophoretic Mobility of Slime Mould Cells and its relationship to Current Theories of Cell Adhesion. Nature 221, 192–193 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/221192a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/221192a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing