Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Inhibition of Hypostome Formation and Polarity Reversal in Hydra

Abstract

REGENERATION of Hydra littoralis is usually strictly polarized in the sense that distal structures such as hypostome and tentacles always form at the distal cut surface whereas proximal structures such as the basal disk always form at the proximal cut surface. The physiological basis of this polarity is unknown, but most theories of hypostome regeneration imply that the hypostome forms at the high point of a gradient which runs from the hypostome to the basal disk (disto-proximally), and defines the polarity. The nature of this gradient is unknown but it is variously regarded as one of metabolic activity1, growth substances2, or inhibitor threshold3. Polarity need not necessarily involve a gradient. If, for example, the transfer of positional information4 were polarized in a disto-proximal direction, the distal end could be specified as that region which received no positional information from other cells. Another type of model could operate if each cell were polarized and the absence of cells at a cut surface were recognized5. Whether a cut surface is necessary for the regeneration of distal structures is a very old problem1. Far less attention has been paid to the problem of basal disk regeneration and particularly whether it is dependent on the presence of a functioning hypostome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Child, C. M., Patterns and Problems of Development (University of Chicago Press, 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burnett, A. L., Amer. Nat., 100, 165 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Webster, G., J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 16, 105 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolpert, L., in Towards a Theoretical Biology, 3 (edit. by Waddington, C. H.) (Edinburgh University Press, in the press).

  5. Wolpert, L., in Towards a Theoretical Biology, 1, Prolegomena, 125 (edit. by Waddington, C. H.) (Edinburgh University Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Webster, G., and Wolpert, L., J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 16, 91 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarkson, S. G., and Wolpert, L., Nature, 214, 780 (1967).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cleland, W. W., Biochemistry, 3, 480 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Descotils-Heernu, F., Quertier, J., and Brachet, J., Develop. Biol., 3, 277 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Muscatine, L., in The Biology of Hydra (edit. by Lenhoff, H. M., and Loomis, W. F.), 255 (University of Miami Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Webster, G., J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 18, 181 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MacWilliams, H. K., and Kafatos, F. C., Science, 159, 1246 (1968).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. King, W., Arch. EntwMech. Org., 13, 135 (1901).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burnett, A. L., J. Exp. Zool., 146, 21 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brachet, J., in Advances in Morphogenesis, 3 (edit. by Abercrombie, M., and Brachet, J.) 247 (Academic Press, London, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Borisy, G. G., and Taylor, E. W., J. Cell Biol., 34, 525 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stephens, R. E., J. Cell Biol., 32, 255 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vacquier, V. D., and Mazia, D., Exp. Cell Res., 52, 209 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Needham, A. E., Regeneration and Wound-healing (Methuen, London, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Flickinger, R. A., Growth, 23, 251 (1959).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HICKLIN, J., HORNBRUCH, A. & WOLPERT, L. Inhibition of Hypostome Formation and Polarity Reversal in Hydra. Nature 221, 1268–1271 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/2211268b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2211268b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing