Abstract
SOME authors have suggested that the nature of the contiguity between the ammonoid proseptum and the shell wall indicates that there is no junction, but that the two are continuous resulting from contemporaneous formation1–3. This contrasts with the relationship between “normal” septa (that is, all septa excluding the proseptum) and the shell wall to which they are attached. There is abundant evidence in the case of “normal” septa that they were secreted by the animal's adapical soft parts to the inner surface of previously formed shell. The time relationship between each septum and the shell to which it is attached will therefore be the amount of time the animal takes to secrete shell proper equivalent in length to its body chamber, as shown for Nautilus pompilius Linné by Eichler and Ristedt4. Other authors5–8 maintain that the proseptum was inserted in an identical manner to normal septa. House6 (page 88) points out that the protoconch apparatus (prosiphon and caecum, Figs. 1A and 2E) is attached to the protoconch wall and must have been formed after this wall, but have preceded the proseptum.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grandjean, F., Bull. Géol. Soc. France, Sér., 4, 10, 496 (1910).
Miller, A. K., and Unklesbay, A. G., J. Paleontol., 17, 1, (1943).
Arkell, W. J., in Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (edit. by Moore, R. C.) (Univ. Kansas Press and Geol. Soc. Amer., 1957).
Eichler, R., and Ristedt, H., Science, 153, 734 (1966).
Hyatt, A., in Zittel's Textbook of Palaeontology (edit. by Eastman, C. R.) (Macmillan, London, 1900).
House, M. R., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, 763, 250, 79 (1965).
Erben, H. K., Paläontol. Z., 36, 3, 99 (1962).
Erben, H. K., Biol. Rev., 41, 641 (1966).
Branco, W., Palaeontographica, 26 A, 15 (1879–80).
Branco, W., Palaeontographica, 27 A, 11 (1880–81).
Makowski, H., Palaeont. Pol., 12 (1962).
Palframan, D. F. B., Palaeontology, 9, 2, 290 (1966).
Palframan, D.F. B., Palaeontology, 10, 1, 60 (1967).
Birkelund, T., Medd. Dansk. Geol. Foren., 17, 95 (1967).
Swinnerton, H. H., and Trueman, A. E., Q. J. Geol. Soc., 73, 26 (1918).
Hyatt, A., Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 32, 143, 349 (1894).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PALFRAMAN, D. Mode of Early Shell Growth in the Ammonite Promicroceras marstonense Spath. Nature 216, 1128–1130 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2161128b0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2161128b0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.