Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Early Radiation Field and High-energy Electrons in Supernovae

Abstract

THE discovery of an X-ray source associated with the Crab Nebula1,2 has prompted an intensive search for X-ray sources associated with other known Type I supernovae, for example, Tycho, and Kepler3,4. So far this search has proved fruitless. One is thus led to wonder what essential differences between supernovae of the same type might result in the presence or absence of X-ray emission. Morrison and Sartori5 have proposed a thermal radiation model to account for this discrepancy. On the other hand, Woltjer6 has argued that the observed X-ray emission from the Crab Nebula is due to synchrotron radiation. I suggest that if Woltjer's hypothesis is correct, a critical part is played by the intensity of the early post-explosion radiation field; for this field, by way of the inverse Compton effect, limits the energy of the electrons in the supernova. In fact, I estimate that no extreme relativistic electrons (E > 1012 eV) can survive the first few weeks after the explosion. The situation is somewhat similar to that which gives rise to an upper bound on the energy of cosmic-ray electrons—the inverse Compton effect from starlight and synchrotron radiation in the galactic magnetic fields forcing a limit on the electron energy7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gursky, H., Giacconi, R., Paolini, R., and Rossi, B., Phys. Rev. Letters, 11, 530 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowyer, S., Byram, E. T., Chubb, T. A., and Friedman, H., Nature, 201, 1307 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowyer, S., Byram, E. T., Chubb, T. A., and Friedman, H., Science, 147, 394 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, G. W., Garmire, G., Oda, M., Wada, M., Giacconi, R., Gursky, H., and Waters, J., Nature, 205, 554 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morrison, P., and Sartori, L., Phys. Rev. Letters, 14, 771 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Woltjer, L., Astrophys. J., 140, 1309 (1964).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Feenberg, E., and Primakoff, H., Phys. Rev., 72, 449 (1948).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hewish, A., and Okoye, S., Nature, 207, 59 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, F. C., Phys. Rev., 137, B1306 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parker, E., Phys. Rev. Letters, 14, 55 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MANLEY, O. Early Radiation Field and High-energy Electrons in Supernovae. Nature 209, 901–902 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/209901a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/209901a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing