Abstract
JONES1, in New Zealand, has reported that rotating cyclamen and bean plants in a clockwise direction about a vertical axis at one revolution per day resulted in a loss of turgidity and accelerated the death of leaves, whereas normal growth was maintained when the direction of rotation was anti-clockwise. In other experiments it was shown that when etiolated Avena seedlings were rotated in darkness in the same manner, clockwise rotation caused a reduction in root and shoot extension growth, while, by contrast, anti-clockwise rotation brought about increased growth. Jones did not interpret these results, which were reported as being distinct and unequivocal, and they do not appear to be gravitational or centrifugal responses. However, Jones's technique of slowly rotating plants about a vertical axis has recently been used2,3 in experiments to support claims that in some plants, notably cereals, growth and root orientation is affected by the horizontal component of the magnetic field of the Earth. To seek independent confirmation of Jones's findings, similar experiments have been carried out in Griffith, Australia, at latitude 34.18° S., using cyclamen and etiolated Avena seedlings. Negative findings are reported here.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jones, R. L., Nature, 185, 775 (1960).
Pittman, U. J., Canad. J. Plant Sci., 42, 430 (1962).
Pittman, U. J., Canad. J. Plant Sci., 44, 283 (1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PALMER, J. Re-examination of the Effect of Daily Rotation in the Horizontal Plane on Growth of Cyclamen Plants and Etiolated Avena Seedlings. Nature 209, 631–632 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/209631a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/209631a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.