Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Inappropriate Constancy Explanation of Spatial Distortions

Abstract

THE perception of two- and three-dimensional space has for long been one of the central issues in the experimental study of sensory and perceptual processes. An aspect of this problem is the apparent distortions of shape, size and direction which occur when the elements of a stimulus pattern (lines, angles, forms, etc.) are juxtaposed in certain spatial relationships. Such spatial illusions, which can be defined as discrepancies between the judged and true physical properties of the stimulus, have not yet been explained satisfactorily. It is clear, however, that their explanation would constitute a considerable advance in our understanding of the perceptual processes involved in space perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gregory, R. L., Nature, 199, 678 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gregory, R. L., Listener, 16, 1736 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gregory, R. L., Nature, 204, 302 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tausch, R., Psychol. Forschung., 24, 299 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, L. B., and Houssiadas, L., Nature, 204, 302 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Teuber, H-L., in Handbook of Physiology, Sect. I, Neurophysiology, edit. by Field et al. (American Physiol. Soc., Washington, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufman, L., and Rock, I., Science, 136, 953, 1023 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Revesz, G., Z. Psychol., 131, 296 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rudel, R. G., and Teuber, H.-L., Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 15, 125 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ratliff, F., in Sensory Communication, edit. by Rosenblith (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sanford, E. C., Experimental Psychology (D. C. Heath and Co., London, 1897).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Logan, J. A., Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Sydney (1963).

  13. King, W. L., and Gruber, H. E., Science, 135, 1125 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Motokawa, K., J. Neurophysiol., 13, 413 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DAY, R. Inappropriate Constancy Explanation of Spatial Distortions. Nature 207, 891–893 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/207891a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/207891a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing