Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Quantitative Relations between Doses of Chemical Protective Agents and Doses of X-irradiation

Abstract

IN a previous paper1 we quoted a number of results appearing in the literature which demonstrate quantitative relationships between the dose of protective agent and radiation dose. This applies especially to sulphydryl substances. In assuming that the sulphydryl protective agents act as radical scavengers this can be easily understood. Higher radiation doses may produce higher concentrations of radicals in the tissue and for this reason the concentration of radical scavengers must also be higher. Contrary to this, high radical scavenger doses may have relatively less protective effect in lower radiation doses. The increase rate of the protective effect of such agents is larger for higher radiation doses than for lower ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koch, R., and Langendorff, M., Strahlentherapie, 120, 269 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koch, R., Strahlentherapie, Sdb., 51, 224 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Meer, C., and van Bekkum, D. W., Intern. J. Rad. Biol., 1, 5 (1959).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KOCH, R., SEITER, I. Quantitative Relations between Doses of Chemical Protective Agents and Doses of X-irradiation. Nature 203, 984–985 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/203984a0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/203984a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing