Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Role of DDT-hydroxylation in Resistance

Abstract

To prove the rate of enzymatic detoxication in resistance, a direct correlation between the degree of insecticide resistance with the enzyme system concentration within the insect must be shown. Thus, in the housefly, DDT* is readily converted to DDE by cell-free preparations and the resistance appears to be proportional to the DDT-dehydrochlorinase activity1. DDT is also metabolized to a ‘Kelthane’-like material by a microsomal enzyme system, in several insect species, including Triatoma infestans2,3. However, no significant data are available on the possible relation of DDT-hydroxylation to resistance. Correlation between the level of enzymatic detoxication and resistance can be shown by in vivo specific inhibition or stimulation of the enzymatic process, resulting in decreased or increased resistance, respectively. In this respect, it is known that SKF 525–A and other compounds, such as iproniazid, block microsomal hydroxylation reactions4, while 3-methylcholanthrene acts like an activator5. By using this last approach, it has been possible to show that the degree of tolerance to DDT by nymph T. infestans can be modified by the foregoing inhibitors and activators, suggesting that DDT-hydroxylation plays indeed a part in resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sternburg, J. E., Kearns, C. W., and Moorfield, H. H., Agric. Food. Chem., 2, 1125 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Agosin, M., Michaeli, D., Miskus, R., Nagasawa, S., and Hoskins, W. M., J. Econ. Entomol., 54, 340 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dinamarca, M. L., Agosin, M., and Neghme, A., Exp. Parasitol., 12, 61 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fouts, J. R., and Brodie, B. B., Exp. Therap., 116, 480 (1956).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nasu, H., and Sakamoto, J., J. Biochem., 52, 351 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Agosin, M., Scaramelli, N., and Neghme, A., Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 2, 143 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sternburg, J., and Kearns, C. W., J. Econ. Entomol., 45, 505 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hewlett, P. S., Lloyd, C. D., and Bates, A. N., Nature, 192, 1273 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Terriere, L. C., W.H.O. Information Circ. Insecticide Resistance, 37, 7 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MORELLO, A. Role of DDT-hydroxylation in Resistance. Nature 203, 785–786 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/203785a0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/203785a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing