Abstract
THE differential visual thresholds of a group of children aged 8–10 years and a group of adults aged 18–22 years have been compared using a technique similar to that used by Gregory and Kendon1. Subjects were asked to vary the intensity of a test spot 3 mm in diameter in a field 100 mm long by 25 mm high at a distance of 2.5 m. A series of eight different intensities of the background field was used and each subject was given one series with the background intensity increasing and one series decreasing. The results of these experiments for the two groups of ten subjects are shown in Fig. 1 by plotting δI against I, where δI is the difference between the intensity of the background and of the test spot for the spot to be correctly located and I is the intensity of the background field. The results of trials with the background intensity increasing and decreasing are pooled, the justification for this being that the same result is achieved by plotting the results from the two series of trials separately. It will be seen that at every level of illumination used the adults had a lower threshold than the children.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gregory, R. L., Proc. Fourth Congr. Intern. Assoc. Gerontol., Merano, 1957, 1, 134 (1959). Welfort, A. T., Ageing and Human Skill, 158 (Oxf. Univ. Press for Nuffield Found., 1958).
Weale, R. A., in Behavior, Ageing and the Nervous System, edit. by Welford, A. T., and Birren, James E. (Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois; in the press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
JEEVES, M. Ageing and Noise in the Visual System. Nature 203, 435–436 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/203435a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/203435a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.